Literature DB >> 7530190

Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey.

M R Nuwer1, E G Dawson, L G Carlson, L E Kanim, J E Sherman.   

Abstract

Neurologic deficits were compared to somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) spinal cord monitoring in a survey of spinal orthopedic surgeons. Experienced SEP spinal cord monitoring teams had fewer than one-half as many neurologic deficits per 100 cases compared to teams with relatively little monitoring experience. Experienced SEP monitoring teams also had fewer neurologic deficits than were seen in previous surveys of this group. Definite neurologic deficits, despite stable SEPs (false negative monitoring), occurred during surgery in only 0.063% of patients. Factors independently associated with fewer neurologic deficits also included the surgeon's years of experience in orthopedic surgery and the use of the wake-up test. Other technical survey results are also presented here. These results confirm the clinical efficacy of experienced SEP spinal cord monitoring for prevention of neurologic deficits during spinal surgery such as for scoliosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7530190     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(94)00235-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  71 in total

1.  Prevention of spinal cord injury with time-frequency analysis of evoked potentials: an experimental study.

Authors:  Y Hu; K D Luk; W W Lu; A Holmes; J C Leong
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Application of time-frequency analysis to somatosensory evoked potential for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring.

Authors:  Y Hu; K D K Luk; W W Lu; J C Y Leong
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 3.  False negative findings in intraoperative SEP monitoring: analysis of 658 consecutive neurosurgical cases and review of published reports.

Authors:  H Wiedemayer; I E Sandalcioglu; W Armbruster; J Regel; H Schaefer; D Stolke
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Intraoperative spinal cord and nerve root monitoring: a survey of Canadian spine surgeons.

Authors:  Lissa Peeling; Stephen Hentschel; Richard Fox; Hamilton Hall; Daryl R Fourney
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 5.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Jong-Hwa Park; Seung-Jae Hyun
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.337

6.  Intraoperative monitoring using somatosensory evoked potentials. A position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring.

Authors:  J Richard Toleikis
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Cerebral Monitoring in the Operating Room and the Intensive Care Unit: An introductory for the clinician and a guide for the novice wanting to open a window to the brain. Part III: Spinal cord evoked potentials.

Authors:  Enno Freye
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 8.  The clinical role of evoked potentials.

Authors:  P Walsh; N Kane; S Butler
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 9.  Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update.

Authors:  David B Macdonald
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Predictive Value of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Monitoring during Resection of Intraparenchymal and Intraventricular Tumors Using an Endoscopic Port.

Authors:  Parthasarathy Thirumala; Daniel Lai; Jonathan Engh; Miguel Habeych; Donald Crammond; Jeffrey Balzer
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.077

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.