Literature DB >> 17610090

Multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during cervical spine surgical procedures in 246 patients.

Andreas Eggspuehler1, Martin A Sutter, Dieter Grob, Dezsö Jeszenszky, François Porchet, Jiri Dvorak.   

Abstract

A prospective study of 246 patients who received multimodal intraoperative monitoring during cervical spine surgery between March 2000 and December 2005. To determine the sensitivity and specificity of MIOM techniques used to monitor spinal cord and nerve root function during cervical spine surgery. It is appreciated that complication rate of cervical spine surgery is low, however, there is a significant risk of neurological injury. The combination of monitoring of ascending and descending pathways may provide more sensitive and specific results giving immediate feedback information and/or alert regarding any neurological changes during the operation to the surgeon. Intraoperative somatosensory spinal and cerebral evoked potentials combined with continuous EMG and motor-evoked potentials of the spinal cord and muscles were evaluated and compared with postoperative clinical neurological changes. A total of 246 consecutive patients with cervical pathologies, majority spinal stenosis due to degenerative changes of cervical spine were monitored by means of MIOM during the surgical procedure. About 232 patients presented true negative while 2 patients false negative responses. About ten patients presented true positive responses where neurological deficit after the operation was predicted and two patients presented false positive findings. The sensitivity of MIOM applied during cervical spine procedure (anterior and/or posterior) was 83.3% and specificity of 99.2%. MIOM is an effective method of monitoring the spinal cord functional integrity during cervical spine surgery and can help to reduce the risk of neurological deficit by alerting the surgeon when monitoring changes are observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17610090      PMCID: PMC2072893          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0424-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  11 in total

Review 1.  Motor evoked potential monitoring for spinal cord and brain stem surgery.

Authors:  F Sala; P Lanteri; A Bricolo
Journal:  Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg       Date:  2004

2.  A prospective analysis of intraoperative electromyographic monitoring of posterior cervical screw fixation.

Authors:  Mladen Djurasovic; John R Dimar; Steven D Glassman; Harvey L Edmonds; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-12

3.  Motor evoked potential monitoring improves outcome after surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a historical control study.

Authors:  Francesco Sala; Giorgio Palandri; Elisabetta Basso; Paola Lanteri; Vedran Deletis; Franco Faccioli; Albino Bricolo
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 4.  Multimodal intraoperative monitoring: an overview and proposal of methodology based on 1,017 cases.

Authors:  Martin Sutter; Andreas Eggspuehler; Alfred Muller; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  "The disappearing evoked potentials": a special problem of positioning patients with skeletal dysplasia: case report.

Authors:  Elisha Ofiram; John E Lonstein; Stan Skinner; Joseph H Perra
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Charles J Taunt; Kanwaldeep S Sidhu; Shane A Andrew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Adult intramedullary spinal cord ependymomas: the result of surgery in 38 patients.

Authors:  F J Epstein; J P Farmer; D Freed
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine corpectomy surgery: experience with 508 cases.

Authors:  Mustafa H Khan; Patrick N Smith; Jeffrey R Balzer; Donald Crammond; William C Welch; Peter Gerszten; Robert J Sclabassi; James D Kang; William F Donaldson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The diagnostic value of multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during spine surgery: a prospective study of 1,017 patients.

Authors:  Martin Sutter; Andreas Eggspuehler; Dieter Grob; Dezsoe Jeszenszky; Arnaldo Benini; François Porchet; Alfred Mueller; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Neurophysiological monitoring of spinal cord function during instrumented anterior cervical fusion.

Authors:  Bikash Bose; Anthony K Sestokas; Daniel M Schwartz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  14 in total

1.  Intraoperative spinal cord and nerve root monitoring: a survey of Canadian spine surgeons.

Authors:  Lissa Peeling; Stephen Hentschel; Richard Fox; Hamilton Hall; Daryl R Fourney
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Current opinions and recommendations on multimodal intraoperative monitoring during spine surgeries.

Authors:  Martin Sutter; Vedran Deletis; Jiri Dvorak; Andreas Eggspuehler; Dieter Grob; David Macdonald; Alfred Mueller; Francesco Sala; Tetsuya Tamaki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2007.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Usefulness of multi-channels in intraoperative spinal cord monitoring: multi-center study by the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

Authors:  Zenya Ito; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Kenichi Shinomiya; Muneharu Ando; Shigenori Kawabata; Tsukasa Kanchiku; Takanori Saito; Masato Takahashi; Shinichiro Taniguchi; Naoya Yamamoto; Kei Yamada; Kazunobu Kida; Yasushi Fujiwara; Sho Kobayashi; Kazuhiko Satomi; Toshikazu Tani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Improving safety in spinal deformity surgery: advances in navigation and neurologic monitoring.

Authors:  John M Flynn; Denis S Sakai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  [Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring with evoked potentials].

Authors:  R Nitzschke; N Hansen-Algenstaedt; J Regelsberger; A E Goetz; M S Goepfert
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Neurophysiologic monitoring can predict iatrogenic injury during acetabular and pelvic fracture fixation.

Authors:  Manny Porat; Fabio Orozco; Nitin Goyal; Zachary Post; Alvin Ong
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-08-08

8.  Analysis of 1014 consecutive operative cases to determine the utility of intraoperative neurophysiological data.

Authors:  Namath Syed Hussain
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

9.  A review of intraoperative monitoring for spinal surgery.

Authors:  Mark M Stecker
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-07-17

10.  The need to add motor evoked potential monitoring to somatosensory and electromyographic monitoring in cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.