Literature DB >> 17639410

Influence of heart rate on diagnostic accuracy and image quality of 16-slice CT coronary angiography: comparison of multisegment and halfscan reconstruction approaches.

Marc Dewey1, Florian Teige, Michael Laule, Bernd Hamm.   

Abstract

The lower the heart rate the better image quality in multislice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography. We prospectively assessed the influence of heart rate on per-patient diagnostic accuracy and image quality of MSCT coronary angiography and compared adaptive multisegment and standard halfscan reconstruction. A consecutive cohort of 126 patients scheduled to undergo conventional coronary angiography was examined with 16-slice CT. For all heart rate groups, per-patient diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher for multisegment than halfscan reconstruction with values of 95 vs. 79% (p < 0.05, <65 bpm, 38 patients), 85 vs. 66% (p < 0.05, 65-74 bpm, 47 patients), and 78% vs. 41% (p < 0.001, >74 bpm, 41 patients). Differences in diagnostic accuracy between adjacent heart rate groups were only significant for halfscan reconstruction for the comparison between the 65-74 and >74 bpm group (p < 0.05). The vessel lengths free of motion artifacts were significantly longer with multisegment reconstruction in all heart rate groups and for all coronary arteries (p < 0.005). For noninvasive MSCT coronary angiography, both per-patient diagnostic accuracy and image quality decline with increasing heart rate, and multisegment reconstruction at high heart rates yields similar results as standard halfscan reconstruction at low heart rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17639410     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0685-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  42 in total

1.  Optimal electrocardiographically triggered phase for reducing motion artifact at electron-beam CT in the coronary artery.

Authors:  S He; R Dai; Y Chen; H Bai
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study.

Authors:  J A Knottnerus; J W Muris
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and optimal reconstruction window in retrospective ECG-gated multislice CT at 375-ms gantry rotation time.

Authors:  Xavier L Hamoir; Thomas Flohr; Vincent Hamoir; Laurent Labaki; Jean-Yves Tricquet; Alain Duhamel; Jacques Kirsch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience.

Authors:  Thorsten R C Johnson; Konstantin Nikolaou; Bernd J Wintersperger; Alexander W Leber; Franz von Ziegler; Carsten Rist; Sonja Buhmann; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography--initial experience.

Authors:  Stephan Achenbach; Dieter Ropers; Axel Kuettner; Thomas Flohr; Bernd Ohnesorge; Herbert Bruder; Heike Theessen; Meri Karakaya; Werner G Daniel; Werner Bautz; Willi A Kalender; Katharina Anders
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for assessment of regional and global left ventricular myocardial function.

Authors:  Marc Dewey; Mira Müller; Florian Teige; Dirk Schnapauff; Tania Schink; Bernd Hamm; Alexander Lembcke
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Intermediate, indeterminate, and uninterpretable diagnostic test results.

Authors:  D L Simel; J R Feussner; E R DeLong; D B Matchar
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1987 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Cardiac motion of coronary arteries: variability in the rest period and implications for coronary MR angiography.

Authors:  Y Wang; E Vidan; G W Bergman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction.

Authors:  Dieter Ropers; Ulrich Baum; Karsten Pohle; Katharina Anders; Stefan Ulzheimer; Bernd Ohnesorge; Christian Schlundt; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  16 in total

1.  Dual-source computed tomographic coronary angiography: image quality and stenosis diagnosis in patients with high heart rates.

Authors:  Minwen Zheng; Jiayi Li; Jian Xu; Kang Chen; Hongliang Zhao; Yi Huan
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2009

Review 2.  Comparison between the image quality of multisegment and halfscan reconstructions of non-invasive CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  D Schnapauff; F Teige; B Hamm; M Dewey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Evaluation of right ventricular function with multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and analysis of inter- and intraobserver variability.

Authors:  Mira Müller; Florian Teige; Dirk Schnapauff; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Applications of cardiac multidetector CT beyond coronary angiography.

Authors:  Karl H Schuleri; Richard T George; Albert C Lardo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Robustness of end-systolic reconstructions in coronary dual-source CT angiography for high heart rate patients.

Authors:  Ghazal Adler; Laurent Meille; Adela Rohnean; Anne Sigal-Cinqualbre; André Capderou; Jean-François Paul
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Impact of a vendor-specific motion-correction algorithm on image quality, interpretability, and diagnostic performance of daily routine coronary CT angiography: influence of heart rate on the effect of motion-correction.

Authors:  Heon Lee; Jeong A Kim; Ji Sung Lee; Jon Suh; Sang Hyun Paik; Jai Soung Park
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Contrast agent bolus tracking with a fixed threshold or a manual fast start for coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Fabian Stenzel; Matthias Rief; Elke Zimmermann; Johannes Greupner; Felicitas Richter; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Triple rule-out acute chest pain evaluation using a 320-row-detector volume CT: a comparison of the wide-volume and helical modes.

Authors:  Eun-Ju Kang; Ki-Nam Lee; Dong Won Kim; Bo Sung Kim; Sunseob Choi; Byeong-Ho Park; Jong Young Oh
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64.

Authors:  Julie M Miller; Marc Dewey; Andrea L Vavere; Carlos E Rochitte; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Narinder Paul; John Hoe; Albert de Roos; Kunihiro Yoshioka; Pedro A Lemos; David E Bush; Albert C Lardo; John Texter; Jeffery Brinker; Christopher Cox; Melvin E Clouse; João A C Lima
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  3D fusion of intravascular ultrasound and coronary computed tomography for in-vivo wall shear stress analysis: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Alina G van der Giessen; Michiel Schaap; Frank J H Gijsen; Harald C Groen; Theo van Walsum; Nico R Mollet; Jouke Dijkstra; Frans N van de Vosse; Wiro J Niessen; Pim J de Feyter; Antonius F W van der Steen; Jolanda J Wentzel
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.