Literature DB >> 1763685

"Standard" microsurgical lumbar discectomy vs. "conservative" microsurgical discectomy. A preliminary study.

H Striffeler1, U Gröger, H J Reulen.   

Abstract

The "conservative" microsurgical lumbar discectomy described by Williams for the treatment of herniated lumbar disc is compared in a retrospective study with the standard microsurgical technique of Caspar and Loew. In order to enable such a retrospective comparison, a special randomization had to be chosen. The data concerning outcome are based on a questionnaire, in which the patient can describe his actual health situation. The result in the group of 56 patients operated on by the Williams technique with a mean follow-up of 27 months is excellent or good in 89% vs. 74% in the standard technique group. Reoperations due to a recurrence were identical in both groups (3.6% and 3.9%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1763685     DOI: 10.1007/bf01402455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  10 in total

1.  Experience with limited versus extensive disc removal in patients undergoing microsurgical operations for ruptured lumbar discs.

Authors:  L A Rogers
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Microlumbar discectomy. A 12-year statistical review.

Authors:  R W Williams
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Results of microsurgical lumbar discectomy. Review on 485 patients.

Authors:  U Ebeling; W Reichenberg; H J Reulen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Microsurgical removal of lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus.

Authors:  H J Goald
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1979-08

5.  Microsurgical lumbar discectomy: preliminary report of 83 consecutive cases.

Authors:  D H Wilson; J Kenning
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Microsurgical reoperation following lumbar disc surgery. Timing, surgical findings, and outcome in 92 patients.

Authors:  U Ebeling; H Kalbarcyk; H J Reulen
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Microlumbar discectomy: follow-up of 477 patients.

Authors:  H J Goald
Journal:  J Microsurg       Date:  1980-12

8.  Lumbar discectomy. Results with limited disc excision and selective foraminotomy.

Authors:  D M Spengler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Microlumbar discectomy: a conservative surgical approach to the virgin herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  R W Williams
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Microlumbar discectomy: followup of 147 patients.

Authors:  H J Goald
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 3.468

  10 in total
  12 in total

1.  Fragment excision versus conventional disc removal in the microsurgical treatment of herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  K Faulhauer; C Manicke
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Microsurgical management of the lumbar intervertebral disc-disease.

Authors:  A Kulali; K von Wild
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Incidence of Low Back Pain After Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Disc and Its Effect on Patient-reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Stephen K Mendenhall; Saniya S Godil; Priya Sivasubramanian; Kevin Cahill; John Ziewacz; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Results of simple fragment excision in lumbar disc surgery].

Authors:  E Kast; K Mohr; H-P Richter; W Börm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Minimum two-year follow-up of cases with recurrent disc herniation treated with microdiscectomy and posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilisation.

Authors:  Tuncay Kaner; Mehdi Sasani; Tunc Oktenoglu; Ahmet Levent Aydin; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-02-24

6.  Transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Jun Seok Bae; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-05-04

7.  Microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation: follow-up of 237 patients.

Authors:  E Kotilainen; S Valtonen; C A Carlson
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes after automated open lumbar discectomy and conventional microdiscectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Sang-Ho Lee; Jun Seok Bae
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

9.  Fragmentectomy versus Conventional Microdiscectomy in Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniations : Comparison of Clinical Results and Recurrence Rates.

Authors:  Geum-Seong Baek; Yeon-Seong Kim; Min-Cheol Lee; Jae-Wook Song; Sang-Kyu Kim; In-Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-09-30

10.  Dynamic stabilization for challenging lumbar degenerative diseases of the spine: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Tuncay Kaner; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.