Literature DB >> 27441176

Transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy in obese patients.

Jun Seok Bae1, Sang-Ho Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obese patients are at risk of complications such as slower wound healing and increased infection rates after spinal surgery. Transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (ELD) has advantages over conventional microdiscectomy because it decreases perioperative complications and increases favorable clinical outcomes. No clinical studies have reported ELD in obese patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of transforaminal ELD in obese patients.
METHODS: Obesity is defined as a body mass index (BMI) of more than 30 kg/m2. Our study included 21 obese patients and 27 normal BMI patients treated by posterolateral transforaminal ELD for radiating pain caused by a single-level lumbar disc herniation with more than 2 years of follow-up. Clinical chart reviews and telephone surveys were conducted. Clinical and functional outcomes using VAS and ODI, perioperative complications, and reherniation were evaluated.
RESULTS: Overall clinical and functional outcomes were improved during postoperative follow-up evaluation. There were no immediate perioperative complications, such as infection or durotomy in both groups. In obese group, three patients had late reherniations. Of these, 2 patients had tolerable pain and showed good recovery with conservative treatment; 1 patient who had undergone ELD for recurrent disc herniation underwent open microdiscectomy. In control group, two patients had early reherniation and underwent open microdiscectomy and one patient with late reherniation showed good recovery with conservative treatment.
CONCLUSION: In select cases, ELD is an effective, safe, and minimally invasive technique for obese patients. It decreases perioperative morbidity and allows for both early mobilization and early return to work. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level 3b.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complication; discectomy; endoscopic; obesity; transforaminal

Year:  2016        PMID: 27441176      PMCID: PMC4943208          DOI: 10.14444/3018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  36 in total

1.  Recurrence after successful percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  J M Kim; S H Lee; Y Ahn; D H Yoon; C D Lee; S T Lim
Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg       Date:  2007-04

2.  Pyogenic spondylodiscitis after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Kyeong-Bo Choi; Choon-Dae Lee; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-11-30

3.  Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for intracanalicular disc herniations at L5-S1 using a rigid working channel endoscope.

Authors:  Gun Choi; Sang-Ho Lee; Pradyumna Pai Raiturker; Seungcheol Lee; Yu-Sik Chae
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Learning curve for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Dong Yeob Lee; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Fragment excision versus conventional disc removal in the microsurgical treatment of herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  K Faulhauer; C Manicke
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Lumbar spine surgery in the obese patient.

Authors:  T G Andreshak; H S An; J Hall; B Stein
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1997-10

7.  The impact of minimally invasive spine surgery on perioperative complications in overweight or obese patients.

Authors:  Paul Park; Cheerag Upadhyaya; Hugh J L Garton; Kevin T Foley
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Percutaneous endoscopic approach for highly migrated intracanal disc herniations by foraminoplastic technique using rigid working channel endoscope.

Authors:  Gun Choi; Sang-Ho Lee; Pramod Lokhande; Byoung Joon Kong; Chan Shik Shim; Byungjoo Jung; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Minimally invasive lumbar discectomy in obese patients.

Authors:  John S Cole; Thad R Jackson
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 10.  Postoperative posterior spinal wound infections.

Authors:  J B Massie; J G Heller; J J Abitbol; D McPherson; S R Garfin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Complexities of spine surgery in obese patient populations: a narrative review.

Authors:  Gennadiy A Katsevman; Scott D Daffner; Nicholas J Brandmeir; Sanford E Emery; John C France; Cara L Sedney
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Pain, Disability, and Complication Rate-A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Guilherme Meyer; Ivan Dias DA Rocha; Alexandre Fogaça Cristante; Raphael Martus Marcon; Thiago Pereira Coutinho; Alessandro Gonzalez Torelli; Pedro Araujo Petersen; Olavo Biraghi Letaif; Tarcísio Eloy Pessoa DE Barros Filho
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-02-29

3.  Lumbar disc reherniation after transforaminal lumbar endoscopic discectomy.

Authors:  Thomas A Kosztowski; David Choi; Jared Fridley; Michael Galgano; Ziya Gokaslan; Adetokunbo Oyelese; Albert Edward Telfeian
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

Review 4.  Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy using Transforaminal Endoscopic Spine System technique: Pitfalls that a beginner should avoid.

Authors:  Stylianos Kapetanakis; Grigorios Gkasdaris; Antonios G Angoules; Panagiotis Givissis
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-12-18

5.  Effect of time to first ambulation on recurrence after PELD.

Authors:  Fengwei Qin; Zhaofei Zhang; Caixia Zhang; Yonghui Feng; Sineng Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 2.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.