Literature DB >> 3344091

Experience with limited versus extensive disc removal in patients undergoing microsurgical operations for ruptured lumbar discs.

L A Rogers1.   

Abstract

Of 68 patients undergoing microsurgical operations for ruptured lumbar discs, 33 were treated by removing only the herniated fragments. In the remaining 35, an attempt was made to remove the entire disc. No recurrences followed the more extensive discectomies during follow-up periods varying from 11 to 30 months. Seven recurrences followed operations in which only the offending fragment was removed (recurrence rate of 21%), four within 6 months. Among 68 patients treated by conventional neurosurgical techniques, there was only one recurrence during follow-up periods of at least 4 years. None of the operations was clearly superior in relieving leg pain, but microsurgically treated patients spent less time in the hospital and returned to work more quickly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3344091     DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198801010-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  18 in total

1.  Preliminary Report of Combined Microscopic Fragmentectomy and Nucleoplasty for Sequestrated Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Jae Ho Kim; Seok Won Kim
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-04-30

2.  Fragment excision versus conventional disc removal in the microsurgical treatment of herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  K Faulhauer; C Manicke
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  A history of lumbar disc herniation from Hippocrates to the 1990s.

Authors:  Eeric Truumees
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Surgery for herniated lumbar discs: a literature synthesis.

Authors:  R M Hoffman; K J Wheeler; R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Microsurgical management of the lumbar intervertebral disc-disease.

Authors:  A Kulali; K von Wild
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 6.  Incidence of Low Back Pain After Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Disc and Its Effect on Patient-reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Stephen K Mendenhall; Saniya S Godil; Priya Sivasubramanian; Kevin Cahill; John Ziewacz; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  [Results of simple fragment excision in lumbar disc surgery].

Authors:  E Kast; K Mohr; H-P Richter; W Börm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation: follow-up of 237 patients.

Authors:  E Kotilainen; S Valtonen; C A Carlson
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  "Standard" microsurgical lumbar discectomy vs. "conservative" microsurgical discectomy. A preliminary study.

Authors:  H Striffeler; U Gröger; H J Reulen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Risk factors for early reherniation after lumbar discectomy with or without annular closure: results of a multicenter randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jenny C Kienzler; Javier Fandino; Erik Van de Kelft; Sandro Eustacchio; Gerrit Joan Bouma
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.