Literature DB >> 26550124

Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes after automated open lumbar discectomy and conventional microdiscectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Sang-Ho Lee1, Jun Seok Bae1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Microdiscectomy (MD) is the gold standard for surgical discectomy. As a minimally invasive discectomy, automated open lumbar discectomy (AOLD) is designed to preserve annular integrity and disc height as well as effectively remove herniated disc and degenerated disc material. However, there have been no prospective clinical studies comparing their effectiveness. The study was designed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes after AOLD with those of MD.
METHODS: Seventy-eight patients were evaluated for unilateral leg pain with the presence of disc herniation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans at a single attributable level. Sixty-two patients were enrolled; 33 patients (53%) were randomly assigned to the AOLD group and the remaining 29 patients (47%) were assigned to the MD group. Follow-up assessment was performed for 19 of the AOLD patients and 17 of the MD patients. The average follow-up period was 20 months. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed using VAS and ODI scores. Change of disc height (DH), instability, and disc degeneration were assessed from radiographs, while Modic change and reherniation were assessed using MRI scans.
RESULTS: Postoperative VAS scores for leg pain and ODI scores for function were significantly improved in both groups. Postoperative VAS for back pain tended to decrease in the MD group but the decrease was statistically insignificant (P = 0.081). The postoperative VAS for back pain was significantly reduced in the AOLD group (P = 0.012). Patients from the MD group showed greater DH reduction than the AOLD group (P = 0.049). The MD group experienced greater disc degeneration and Modic change than the AOLD group. Follow-up MRI revealed 2 cases of reherniation in the AOLD group; 1 case was symptomatic, the other was asymptomatic.
CONCLUSIONS: AOLD showed comparable clinical and radiological outcomes to conventional MD. AOLD preserves the central disc and removes only the loose degenerative disc fragments that are the main cause of reherniation by small annulotomy. Our results suggest that preservation of the central disc prevents loss of disc height and segmental instability, which is related to postdiscectomy back pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microdiscectomy; automated open lumbar discectomy; disc herniation; lumbar spine; prospective randomized study; reherniation

Year:  2015        PMID: 26550124      PMCID: PMC4612809     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  36 in total

1.  Sciatica and the intervertebral disc; an experimental study.

Authors:  M J SMYTH; V WRIGHT
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1958-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Microsurgery versus standard removal of the herniated lumbar disc. A 3-year comparison in 150 cases.

Authors:  C Barrios; M Ahmed; J Arrótegui; A Björnsson; P Gillström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1990-10

3.  Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for intracanalicular disc herniations at L5-S1 using a rigid working channel endoscope.

Authors:  Gun Choi; Sang-Ho Lee; Pradyumna Pai Raiturker; Seungcheol Lee; Yu-Sik Chae
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Two-year outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy versus microscopic sequestrectomy: part 2: radiographic evaluation and correlation with clinical outcome.

Authors:  Martin Barth; Michael Diepers; Christel Weiss; Claudius Thomé
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Learning curve for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Dong Yeob Lee; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Disc height and segmental motion as risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tae Kim; Seung-Won Park; Young-Baeg Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Fragment excision versus conventional disc removal in the microsurgical treatment of herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  K Faulhauer; C Manicke
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 8.  Vascular and visceral injuries associated with lumbar disc surgery: medicolegal implications.

Authors:  R Goodkin; L L Laska
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1998-04

9.  Lumbar discectomy. Results with limited disc excision and selective foraminotomy.

Authors:  D M Spengler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Percutaneous endoscopic approach for highly migrated intracanal disc herniations by foraminoplastic technique using rigid working channel endoscope.

Authors:  Gun Choi; Sang-Ho Lee; Pramod Lokhande; Byoung Joon Kong; Chan Shik Shim; Byungjoo Jung; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The association between pain scores and disc height change following discectomy surgery in lumbar disc herniation patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaolong Chen; Harvinder S Sandhu; Jose Vargas Castillo; Ashish D Diwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for pediatric lumbar disc herniation and degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging: case series and literature review.

Authors:  Ruei-Hong Lin; Hung-Chieh Chen; Hung-Chuan Pan; Hsien-Te Chen; Chien-Chun Chang; Chung-Yuh Tzeng; Tse-Yu Chen; Hsi-Kai Tsou
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.671

3.  Comparative Study between Full-Endoscopic Discectomy and Microendoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Muneyoshi Fujita; Tomoaki Kitagawa; Masahiro Hirahata; Takahiro Inui; Hirotaka Kawano; Hiroki Iwai; Hirohiko Inanami; Hisashi Koga
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 2.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.