Literature DB >> 8570065

Microsurgical management of the lumbar intervertebral disc-disease.

A Kulali1, K von Wild.   

Abstract

One hundred consecutive patients operated on for sciatica pain using microsurgical techniques between April 1984 and February 1985 were evaluated retrospectively. This paper gives preoperative clinical data, end-result of surgery, rate of complications and true recurrent herniations. On the basis of the results, both soon after operation and at later follow-up (between three and five years) we feel encouraged to continue using this mode of operation. Complete or significant pain relief was achieved in 92% of patients; 93% were able to return to their preoperative normal physical activities. The frequency of complications was low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8570065     DOI: 10.1007/bf00383724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  21 in total

1.  Microsurgical versus standard lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  H R Silvers
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Microlumbar discectomy.

Authors:  J C Maroon; A A Abla
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  1986

3.  Results of microsurgical lumbar discectomy. Review on 485 patients.

Authors:  U Ebeling; W Reichenberg; H J Reulen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Relief of lumbar canal stenosis using multilevel subarticular fenestrations as an alternative to wide laminectomy: preliminary report.

Authors:  S Young; R Veerapen; S A O'Laoire
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  [Microsurgery reinterventions following lumbar intervertebral disk surgery. Results and prognosis].

Authors:  U Ebeling; H Kalbarcyk; H J Reulen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  The role of microdiscectomy.

Authors:  W R Hudgins
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Microsurgical and standard removal of the protruded lumbar disc: a comparative study.

Authors:  D H Wilson; R Harbaugh
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Microlumbar discectomy: followup of 147 patients.

Authors:  H J Goald
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  A new microsurgical reoperation for failed lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  H J Goald
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.425

10.  The Caspar microsurgical discectomy and comparison with a conventional standard lumbar disc procedure.

Authors:  W Caspar; B Campbell; D D Barbier; R Kretschmmer; Y Gotfried
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  1 in total

1.  The effectiveness of non-surgical treatments, re-discectomy and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in post-discectomy pain syndrome.

Authors:  Mehmet Nuri Erdem; Halil Yener Erken; Mehmet Aydogan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.