Literature DB >> 440544

Microsurgical lumbar discectomy: preliminary report of 83 consecutive cases.

D H Wilson, J Kenning.   

Abstract

The application of microsurgical technique to lumbar discectomy may be of dual value: minimal disruption of the integrity of normal anatomy and meticulous hemostasis may help to speed the process of convalescence, and the retention of epidural fat around the nerve root may help to prevent adhesions, a common cause of the late, "failed disc" syndrome. The authors report their experience with 83 consecutive microdiscectomies for lumbar disc protrusions. The results must be considered as tentative because the follow-up period has been short and the authors found it difficult to quantify the quality of health during the convalescent phase, although this seemed to be excellent. Their short term results are similar to those of the larger series reported by Williams, whose experience with microsurgical lumbar discectomies began 6 years ago. No other series have been reported. The authors describe their technique and compare it to that of Williams.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 440544     DOI: 10.1227/00006123-197902000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  10 in total

1.  Contralateral facet-sparing sublaminar endoscopic foraminotomy for the treatment of lumbar lateral recess stenosis: technical note.

Authors:  Guntram Krzok; Albert E Telfeian; Ralf Wagner; Christoph P Hofstetter; Menno Iprenburg
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

2.  [Not Available].

Authors:  J Krämer
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Results of microsurgical lumbar discectomy. Review on 485 patients.

Authors:  U Ebeling; W Reichenberg; H J Reulen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Microdiscectomy for treating lumbar disc protrusion.

Authors:  G Evans; R K Jackson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-07-02

5.  Surgery for herniated lumbar discs: a literature synthesis.

Authors:  R M Hoffman; K J Wheeler; R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Reoperation after lumbar disc surgery: results in 130 cases.

Authors:  J Fandiño; C Botana; A Viladrich; J Gomez-Bueno
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Interlaminar endoscopic lateral recess decompression-surgical technique and early clinical results.

Authors:  Zeinab Birjandian; Samuel Emerson; Albert E Telfeian; Christoph P Hofstetter
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

8.  The profile of multiple- versus single-operated patients at the time of their first operation for lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  H M Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation: follow-up of 237 patients.

Authors:  E Kotilainen; S Valtonen; C A Carlson
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  "Standard" microsurgical lumbar discectomy vs. "conservative" microsurgical discectomy. A preliminary study.

Authors:  H Striffeler; U Gröger; H J Reulen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.