Literature DB >> 1760973

Detection of hidden visual loss in multiple sclerosis. A comparison of pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials and contrast sensitivity.

M J Leys1, C M Candaele, A F De Rouck, J V Odom.   

Abstract

The detection of hidden visual loss is important in establishing the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, especially in patients who have neurologic symptoms of the disease. Both visual evoked potentials and contrast sensitivity have been used for this purpose. We compared the sensitivities of pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials and contrast sensitivity, measured with the Vistech VCTS 6500 chart, in detecting hidden visual loss in 18 patients with multiple sclerosis whose visual acuity was correctable to 20/20 (6/6) or better in the examined eye. Thirteen patients had delayed visual evoked potential latencies. An additional four patients had reduced P100 amplitudes without prolonged latencies. Nine patients had abnormal contrast sensitivity. The visual evoked potential was more sensitive than contrast sensitivity at detecting hidden visual loss in patients with multiple sclerosis (p less than 0.01).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1760973     DOI: 10.1007/bf00161372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  16 in total

1.  The detection of hidden visual loss in optic neuropathy: VISTECH test at variable illuminations.

Authors:  M J Leys; C M Candaele; A G Uvijls; B F Heintz; A F De Rouck; J V Odom
Journal:  Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol       Date:  1990

2.  High and low contrast acuity and clinical contrast sensitivity tested in a normal population.

Authors:  B Brown; J E Lovie-Kitchin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Time domain analysis of VEPs. Detection of waveform abnormalities in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D Urbach; M Gur; H Pratt; R Peled
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-05-06       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Spatio-temporal processing in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M S Marx; J G May; J L Reed; H H Matteson; H J van Dyk; A Jayaraman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-01-30       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Contrast sensitivity measurements in acute and resolved optic neuritis.

Authors:  R W Beck; M C Ruchman; P J Savino; N J Schatz
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Deficits in visual function after resolution of optic neuritis.

Authors:  J A Fleishman; R W Beck; O A Linares; J W Klein
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in multiple sclerosis--hidden visual loss: an auxiliary diagnostic test.

Authors:  D Regan; R Silver; T J Murray
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Visual evoked responses and visual symptoms in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  T Hoeppner; F Lolas
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Pattern VEP in two immunochemical subtypes of optic neuritis.

Authors:  G Lennerstrand; L Stendahl-Brodin
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1982-04
View more
  5 in total

1.  Use of 10-Hz flash visual evoked potentials in prediction of final visual acuity in diabetic eyes with vitreous hemorrhage.

Authors:  V L Vadrevu; S Cavender; J V Odom
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Discriminative power of visual evoked potential characteristics in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M H Cuypers; K Dickson; A J Pinckers; J M Thijssen; O R Hommes
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The pattern visual evoked potential. A multicenter study using standardized techniques.

Authors:  M Brigell; D I Kaufman; P Bobak; A Beydoun
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Pattern visual evoked potentials in Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis without history of visual pathway involvement.

Authors:  Atsushi Mizota; Noriko Asaumi; Michihiko Takasoh; Emiko Adachi-Usami
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Contrast Sensitivity versus Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Javad Heravian Shandiz; Abbas Nourian; Mercedeh Bahr Hossaini; Hadi Ostadi Moghaddam; Abbas-Ali Yekta; Laleh Sharifzadeh; Parviz Marouzi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2010-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.