Literature DB >> 8846733

Discriminative power of visual evoked potential characteristics in multiple sclerosis.

M H Cuypers1, K Dickson, A J Pinckers, J M Thijssen, O R Hommes.   

Abstract

To investigate the discriminative power of pattern-reversal visual evoked potential characteristics (peak latencies and amplitude) and to test whether the addition of visual evoked potential amplitude can increase the power of the visual evoked potential in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, we retrospectively studied visual evoked potentials in 59 patients with definite multiple sclerosis and 126 control subjects. Two check sizes (17' and 10') were used. Females had significantly higher amplitudes and shorter latencies than males. N80 latency showed a gradual increase and P100 amplitude a decrease with age. P100 latency was stable between the ages of 20 and 55 years but was increased in childhood and the elderly. The significance of visual evoked potential peak latencies and amplitude in separating the two groups was investigated by means of a (multivariate) discriminant analysis. The visual evoked potential with a pattern of 10' could be measured in 58% of patients with multiple sclerosis. The exclusive use of the P100 amplitude in the discriminant analysis resulted in a percentage of correctly classified cases of 84%, whereas for P100 and N80 latency it was 85% and 90%, respectively. With the 17' pattern, the N80 latency yielded also a higher correct percentage than did the P100 latency. Although N80 latency is, to a greater extent than P100 latency, influenced by age, sex and size of stimulus pattern, when these influences are accounted for, the N80 latency is a more sensitive measure than P100 latency in the classification of multiple sclerosis. Combined use of latency and amplitude for discriminant analysis yielded no significant improvement of the percentage of correctly classified cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8846733     DOI: 10.1007/bf01203860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  20 in total

1.  Amplitudes of visually evoked potentials to patterned stimuli: age and sex comparisons.

Authors:  J A La Marche; W R Dobson; N B Cohn; R E Dustman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-03

2.  Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials: latency changes with gender and age.

Authors:  N S Chu
Journal:  Clin Electroencephalogr       Date:  1987-07

3.  Shall we count numbers of eyes or numbers of subjects?

Authors:  F Ederer
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1973-01

4.  Age-related changes in the latency of the visual evoked potential: influence of check size.

Authors:  S Sokol; A Moskowitz; V L Towle
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-05

5.  Age-dependent changes in the amplitude of the pattern visual evoked potential.

Authors:  N A Shaw; B R Cant
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-06

6.  Brain stem auditory, pattern-reversal visual, and short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials: latencies in relation to age, sex, and brain and body size.

Authors:  T Allison; C C Wood; W R Goff
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-06

7.  Statistical methods in ophthalmology: an adjustment for the intraclass correlation between eyes.

Authors:  B Rosner
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Comparison of the pattern and diffuse-light visual evoked responses in definite multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W B Wilson; R B Keyser
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1980-01

9.  Age-related changes in pattern visual evoked potentials: differential effects of luminance, contrast and check size.

Authors:  S Tobimatsu; S Kurita-Tashima; M Nakayama-Hiromatsu; K Akazawa; M Kato
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb

Review 10.  Visually evoked potentials: theory, techniques and clinical applications.

Authors:  S Sokol
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

View more
  4 in total

1.  Quantitative functional MR imaging of the visual cortex at 1.5 T as a function of luminance contrast in healthy volunteers and patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Scott H Faro; Feroze B Mohamed; Joseph I Tracy; Robert M Elfont; Alexander B Pinus; Fred D Lublin; Robert A Koenigsberg; Cheng Y Chen; Fong Y Tsai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Predicting inter-hemispheric transfer time from the diffusion properties of the corpus callosum in healthy individuals and schizophrenia patients: a combined ERP and DTI study.

Authors:  Thomas J Whitford; Marek Kubicki; Shahab Ghorashi; Jason S Schneiderman; Kathryn J Hawley; Robert W McCarley; Martha E Shenton; Kevin M Spencer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Prognostic value of pattern reversal visual-evoked potentials in idiopathic epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  M A Tilanus; M H Cuypers; N A Bemelmans; A J Pinckers
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Electrophysiological and diffusion tensor imaging evidence of delayed corollary discharges in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  T J Whitford; D H Mathalon; M E Shenton; B J Roach; R Bammer; R A Adcock; S Bouix; M Kubicki; J De Siebenthal; A C Rausch; J S Schneiderman; J M Ford
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 7.723

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.