Literature DB >> 7956687

The pattern visual evoked potential. A multicenter study using standardized techniques.

M Brigell1, D I Kaufman, P Bobak, A Beydoun.   

Abstract

The peak latency of the pattern-reversal visual evoked potential is a sensitive measure of conduction delay in the optic nerve caused by demyelination. Despite its clinical utility, the pattern-reversal visual evoked potential has not previously been used in multicenter clinical trials, presumably because of difficulty in standardizing conditions between centers. To establish whether the pattern-reversal visual evoked potential could be adequately standardized for use as a measure in multicenter therapeutic trials for optic neuropathy or multiple sclerosis, stimulus and recording variables were equated at four centers and pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials were recorded from 64 normal subjects and 15 patients with resolved optic neuritis. Results showed equivalent latency and amplitude data from all centers, suggesting that stimulus and recording variables can be satisfactorily standardized for multicenter clinical trials. N70 and P100 peak latencies and N70-P100 interocular amplitude difference were sensitive measures of resolved optic neuritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7956687     DOI: 10.1007/BF01224629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  42 in total

1.  Variability on serial testing of pattern reversal visual evoked potential latencies from full-field, half-field and foveal stimulation in control subjects.

Authors:  S R Hammond; S MacCallum; C Yiannikas; J C Walsh; J G McLeod
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-04

2.  The comparison of small-size rectangle and checkerboard stimulation for the evaluation of delayed visual evoked responses in patients suspected of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M Hennerici; D Wenzel; H J Freund
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the optic nerve in optic neuritis.

Authors:  D H Miller; M R Newton; J C van der Poel; E P du Boulay; A M Halliday; B E Kendall; G Johnson; D G MacManus; I F Moseley; W I McDonald
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Pathophysiology of demyelinating disease.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.291

5.  Physiologic basis for neuroelectric blocking activity in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  C L Schauf; T L Pencek; F A Davis; M W Rooney
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Serial evoked potential studies in patients with definite multiple sclerosis. Clinical relevance.

Authors:  M J Aminoff; S L Davis; H S Panitch
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1984-11

7.  Neurophysiological investigation in optic nerve disease: combined assessment of the visual evoked response and electroretinogram.

Authors:  H Ikeda; K E Tremain; M D Sanders
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Simultaneous recording of pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and visual evoked potential (VEP) in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  E Stefano; L M Cupini; P Rizzo; F Pierelli; P A Rizzo
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.396

9.  A randomized, controlled trial of corticosteroids in the treatment of acute optic neuritis. The Optic Neuritis Study Group.

Authors:  R W Beck; P A Cleary; M M Anderson; J L Keltner; W T Shults; D I Kaufman; E G Buckley; J J Corbett; M J Kupersmith; N R Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-02-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Evolution of visual evoked potentials in optic neuritis.

Authors:  I H Heinrichs; D R McLean
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.104

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sport-related concussion and sensory function in young adults.

Authors:  Robert D Moore; Steven P Broglio; Charles H Hillman
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Developmental Effects on Pattern Visual Evoked Potentials Characterized by Principal Component Analysis.

Authors:  Carlyn Patterson Gentile; Nabin R Joshi; Kenneth J Ciuffreda; Kristy B Arbogast; Christina Master; Geoffrey K Aguirre
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Reference ranges for clinical electrophysiology of vision.

Authors:  C Quentin Davis; Ruth Hamilton
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.