Literature DB >> 17549532

Pattern visual evoked potentials in Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis without history of visual pathway involvement.

Atsushi Mizota1, Noriko Asaumi, Michihiko Takasoh, Emiko Adachi-Usami.   

Abstract

A delay of the peak latency of the pattern visual evoked cortical potentials (pVEP) is accepted as one of the paraclinical evidence for a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pVEPs in Japanese patients with MS without a history of visual pathway involvement. We studied the medical records of 29 MS patients without any history of visual pathway involvement, and with visual acuity correctable to > or = 20/20. The Goldmann visual fields, pupillary light reflexes, and optic disks were normal in all. pVEPs elicited by 3 rev/s (transient) and 12 rev/s (steady-state) were recorded from the MS patients and compared with those recorded from normal subjects. The latency of the P100 component of the transient pVEPs was significantly prolonged in 9/29 (31%) MS patients. A phase lag in the steady-state pVEPs was found in 6/29 (21%) MS patients, and the mean amplitude was significantly smaller. The incidence of cases with abnormal pVEPs is lower than that reported from Europe and United State. This difference is possibly due to racial differences, and the use of different criteria for diagnosing optic neuritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17549532     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-007-9062-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  16 in total

Review 1.  Practice parameter: the usefulness of evoked potentials in identifying clinically silent lesions in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Authors:  G S Gronseth; E J Ashman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Conventional perimetry, short-wavelength automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology, and visual evoked potentials in the assessment of patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  G Corallo; S Cicinelli; M Papadia; F Bandini; A Uccelli; G Calabria
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.597

3.  Steady-state PVECP is superior to transient PVECP in the diagnosis of optic neuritis.

Authors:  M Takasoh; E Adachi-Usami; A Mizota
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  1998-04

4.  Visual evoked responses and ophthalmological examination in optic neuritis. A follow-up study.

Authors:  M A Hely; P G McManis; J C Walsh; J G McLeod
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.181

5.  Optic neuritis in Orientals and Caucasians.

Authors:  M Alter; J Good; M Okihiro
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Racial modification of clinical picture of multiple sclerosis: comparison between British and Japanese patients.

Authors:  H Shibasaki; W I McDonald; Y Kuroiwa
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.181

7.  Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  H Shibasaki; Y Kuroiwa
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Subclinical optic neuropathy in multiple sclerosis. How early VER components reflect axon loss and conduction defects in optic pathways.

Authors:  M Feinsod; W F Hoyt
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Visual evoked responses and visual symptoms in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  T Hoeppner; F Lolas
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W I McDonald; A Compston; G Edan; D Goodkin; H P Hartung; F D Lublin; H F McFarland; D W Paty; C H Polman; S C Reingold; M Sandberg-Wollheim; W Sibley; A Thompson; S van den Noort; B Y Weinshenker; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  2 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of visual evoked potentials for clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Niphon Chirapapaisan; Sawarin Laotaweerungsawat; Wanicha Chuenkongkaew; Patthanee Samsen; Ngamkae Ruangvaravate; Atiporn Thuangtong; Nacha Chanvarapha
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Effect of refractive error on visual evoked potentials with pattern stimulation in dogs.

Authors:  Yosuke Ito; Seiya Maehara; Yoshiki Itoh; Ai Matsui; Miri Hayashi; Akira Kubo; Tsuyoshi Uchide
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 1.267

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.