Literature DB >> 671060

Visual evoked responses and visual symptoms in multiple sclerosis.

T Hoeppner, F Lolas.   

Abstract

Absolute latency, interocular difference in latency, and waveform of visual evoked responses (VER) to checkerboard reversal stimuli recorded from the midline of the skull were studied in 104 multiple sclerosis patients, 25 to 50 years of age, classified according to visual symptomatology. Group 1 had strong evidence of past or present optic neuritis. Patients with blurring of vision, diplopia, and undefined visual complaints were assigned to group 2, while group 3 contained patients with no visual symptoms but suspected diagnosis of multiple sclerosis on other grounds. The three parameters explored showed consistent association with the degree of visual involvement, as assessed by clinical impression, but their discriminatory power was diverse. Absolute latency was significantly longer in group 1 patients compared with groups 2 and 3, but it did not discriminate between the last two, whereas interocular difference in latency proved to be sensitive to differences between symptomatic (diplopia, blurring) and asymptomatic groups (2 and 3). Waveshapes were grouped into three categories based upon degree of distortion of the major positive peak, and their relative distribution among the three patient groups was found to be associated with symptomatology. We suggest that, in the production of symptoms such as diplopia, a temporal disparity of afferent impulses might be involved in much the same way that spatial incongruities between both eyes lead to impaired function. In this regard, interocular difference in latency rather than absolute latency would be a more accurate predictor of symptom development. The analysis of VER waveshape suggests, in addition, the importance of inhomogeneous involvement of the visual pathways in the production of symptoms during the evolution of multiple sclerosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 671060      PMCID: PMC493075          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.41.6.493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  11 in total

1.  Visual evoked responses in the diagnosis and management of patients suspected of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  P Asselman; D W Chadwick; D C Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 2.  Pathophysiology in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W I McDonald
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Delay in visual perception in unilateral optic atrophy after retrobulbar neuritis.

Authors:  J R Heron; D Regan; B A Milner
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-05-06       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Variability of the human visual evoked potential: normative data.

Authors:  L Cigánek
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-07

6.  A clinical method for obtaining pattern visual evoked responses.

Authors:  J Behrman; S Nissim; G B Arden
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-12-15

8.  Changes in pattern-evoked responses in man associated with the vertical and horizontal meridians of the visual field.

Authors:  A M Halliday; W F Michael
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Subclinical optic neuropathy in multiple sclerosis. How early VER components reflect axon loss and conduction defects in optic pathways.

Authors:  M Feinsod; W F Hoyt
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Delayed visual perception and delayed visual evoked potentials in the spinal form of multiple sclerosis and in retrobulbar neuritis.

Authors:  D Regan; B A Milner; J R Heron
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  6 in total

1.  Central fiber contribution to W-shaped visual evoked potentials in patients with optic neuritis.

Authors:  J Brecelj; M Strucl; M Hawlina
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Detection of hidden visual loss in multiple sclerosis. A comparison of pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials and contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  M J Leys; C M Candaele; A F De Rouck; J V Odom
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Pattern reversal evoked cortical responses in normals. A study of different methods of stimulation and potential reproducibility.

Authors:  O Meienberg; L Kutak; C Smolenski; H P Ludin
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Pattern and flash visual evoked responses in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A Neetens; Y Hendrata; J van Rompaey
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1979-03-22       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  [Clinical applications of visual evoked potentials for detection of chiasmal and postchiasmal lesions (author's transl)].

Authors:  L M Camacho; W Wenzel; J Aschoff
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1981

6.  Pattern visual evoked potentials in Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis without history of visual pathway involvement.

Authors:  Atsushi Mizota; Noriko Asaumi; Michihiko Takasoh; Emiko Adachi-Usami
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 2.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.