Literature DB >> 17597319

Effect of spectral smearing on the perceptual segregation of vowel sequences.

Etienne Gaudrain1, Nicolas Grimault, Eric W Healy, Jean-Christophe Béra.   

Abstract

Although segregation of both simultaneous and sequential speech items may be involved in the reception of speech in noisy environments, research on the latter is relatively sparse. Further, previous studies examining the ability of hearing-impaired listeners to form distinct auditory streams have produced mixed results. Finally, there is little work investigating streaming in cochlear implant recipients, who also have poor frequency resolution. The present study focused on the mechanisms involved in the segregation of vowel sequences and potential limitations to segregation associated with poor frequency resolution. An objective temporal-order paradigm was employed in which listeners reported the order of constituent vowels within a sequence. In Experiment 1, it was found that fundamental frequency based mechanisms contribute to segregation. In Experiment 2, reduced frequency tuning often associated with hearing impairment was simulated in normal-hearing listeners. In that experiment, it was found that spectral smearing of the vowels increased accurate identification of their order, presumably by reducing the tendency to form separate auditory streams. These experiments suggest that a reduction in spectral resolution may result in a reduced ability to form separate auditory streams, which may contribute to the difficulties of hearing-impaired listeners, and probably cochlear implant recipients as well, in multi-talker cocktail-party situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17597319      PMCID: PMC2128787          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  32 in total

1.  Waveform interactions and the segregation of concurrent vowels.

Authors:  A de Cheveigné
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of spectral and periodicity cues in auditory stream segregation, measured using a temporal discrimination task.

Authors:  J Vliegen; B C Moore; A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Influence of peripheral resolvability on the perceptual segregation of harmonic complex tones differing in fundamental frequency.

Authors:  N Grimault; C Micheyl; R P Carlyon; P Arthaud; L Collet
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of envelope-vocoder processing on F0 discrimination and concurrent-vowel identification.

Authors:  Michael K Qin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Sensitivity to isolated and concurrent intensity and fundamental frequency increments by cochlear implant users under natural listening conditions.

Authors:  Cheryl F Rogers; Eric W Healy; Allen A Montgomery
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Pure-tone auditory stream segregation and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Robert S Hong; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory stream segregation of tone sequences in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Huw R Cooper; Brian Roberts
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Auditory stream segregation with cochlear implants: A preliminary report.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Anastasios Sarampalis; Sandra I Oba
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Sequential stream segregation in the absence of spectral cues.

Authors:  J Vliegen; A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Concurrent sound segregation in electric and acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Long; John M Deeks; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-10
View more
  18 in total

1.  Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream integration and segregation.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-24

2.  Dual-carrier processing to convey temporal fine structure cues: Implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Carla L Youngdahl; Sarah E Yoho; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Streaming of vowel sequences based on fundamental frequency in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Nicolas Grimault; Eric W Healy; Jean-Christophe Béra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on visually guided attention in a multitalker environment.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Nicole Marrone; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-11-14

5.  Sequential stream segregation of voiced and unvoiced speech sounds based on fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Marion David; Mathieu Lavandier; Nicolas Grimault; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Time-efficient measures of auditory frequency selectivity.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Auditory sequential accumulation of spectral information.

Authors:  Yi Shen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Auditory stream segregation of iterated rippled noises by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Daniel E Shearer; Michelle R Molis; Keri O Bennett; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Virginia Best
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30

Review 10.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.