Literature DB >> 17071032

Auditory stream segregation with cochlear implants: A preliminary report.

Monita Chatterjee1, Anastasios Sarampalis, Sandra I Oba.   

Abstract

Auditory stream segregation was measured in cochlear implant (CI) listeners using a subjective "Yes-No" task in which listeners indicated whether a sequence of stimuli was perceived as two separate streams or not. Stimuli were brief, 50-ms pulse trains A and B, presented in an A_B_A_A_B_A... sequence, with 50 ms in between consecutive stimuli. All stimuli were carefully loudness-balanced prior to the experiments. The cochlear electrode location of A was fixed, while the location of B was varied systematically. Measures of electrode discrimination and subjective perceptual difference were also included for comparison. There was strong intersubject variation in the pattern of results. One of the participants participated in a second series of experiments, the results of which indicated that he was able to perceptually segregate stimuli that were different in cochlear electrode location, as well as stimuli that were different in temporal envelope. Although preliminary, these results suggest that it is possible for some cochlear implant listeners to perceptually segregate stimuli based on differences in cochlear location as well as temporal envelope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17071032      PMCID: PMC1820844          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  19 in total

1.  Consonant recordings for speech testing.

Authors:  R V Shannon; A Jensvold; M Padilla; M E Robert; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Influence of peripheral resolvability on the perceptual segregation of harmonic complex tones differing in fundamental frequency.

Authors:  N Grimault; C Micheyl; R P Carlyon; P Arthaud; L Collet
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory stream segregation on the basis of amplitude-modulation rate.

Authors:  Nicolas Grimault; Sid P Bacon; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Talker separation and sequential stream segregation in listeners with hearing loss: patterns associated with talker gender.

Authors:  Carol L Mackersie
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Rhodri Cusack; John Deeks; Genevieve Aikman; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments.

Authors:  W Jesteadt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-07

7.  Primitive stream segregation of tone sequences without differences in fundamental frequency or passband.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Brian R Glasberg; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Perceptual auditory stream segregation of sequences of complex sounds in subjects with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  N Grimault; C Micheyl; R P Carlyon; P Arthaud; L Collet
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  2001-06

9.  Auditory streaming based on temporal structure in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Thomas H Stainsby; Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  A computer interface for psychophysical and speech research with the Nucleus cochlear implant.

Authors:  R V Shannon; D D Adams; R L Ferrel; R L Palumbo; M Grandgenett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  26 in total

1.  Influence of pitch, timbre and timing cues on melodic contour identification with a competing masker (L).

Authors:  Meimei Zhu; Bing Chen; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Across-site patterns of modulation detection in listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Rose A Burkholder-Juhasz; Li Xu; Catherine S Thompson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Streaming of vowel sequences based on fundamental frequency in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Nicolas Grimault; Eric W Healy; Jean-Christophe Béra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of electrode separation between speech and noise signals on consonant identification in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sequential stream segregation using temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Robert S Hong; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Simultaneous grouping in cochlear implant listeners: can abrupt changes in level be used to segregate components from a complex tone?

Authors:  Huw R Cooper; Brian Roberts
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-14

7.  Stream segregation on a single electrode as a function of pulse rate in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Sara I Duran; Leslie M Collins; Chandra S Throckmorton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Rate and onset cues can improve cochlear implant synthetic vowel recognition in noise.

Authors:  Myles Mc Laughlin; Richard B Reilly; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory stream segregation of iterated rippled noises by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Daniel E Shearer; Michelle R Molis; Keri O Bennett; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The effect of visual cues on auditory stream segregation in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Jeremy Marozeau; Hamish Innes-Brown; David B Grayden; Anthony N Burkitt; Peter J Blamey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.