Literature DB >> 9921660

Sequential stream segregation in the absence of spectral cues.

J Vliegen1, A J Oxenham.   

Abstract

This paper investigates the cues used by the auditory system in the perceptual organization of sequential sounds. In particular, the ability to organize sounds in the absence of spectral cues is studied. In the first experiment listeners were presented with a tone sequence ABA ABA ..., where the fundamental frequency (f0) of tone A was fixed at 100 Hz and the f0 difference between tones A and B varied across trials between 1 and 11 semitones. Three spectral conditions were tested: pure tones, harmonic complexes filtered with a bandpass region between 500 and 2000 Hz, and harmonic complexes filtered with a bandpass region chosen so that only harmonics above the tenth would be passed by the filter, thus severely limiting spectral information. Listeners generally reported that they could segregate tones A and B into two separate perceptual streams when the f0 interval exceeded about four semitones. This was true for all conditions. The second experiment showed that most listeners were better able to recognize a short atonal melody interleaved with random distracting tones when the distracting tones were in an f0 region 11 semitones higher than the melody than when the distracting tones were in the same f0 region. The results were similar for both pure tones and complex tones comprising only high, unresolved harmonics. The results from both experiments show that spectral separation is not a necessary condition for perceptual stream segregation. This suggests that models of stream segregation that are based solely on spectral properties may require some revision.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9921660     DOI: 10.1121/1.424503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  56 in total

1.  Neural mechanisms of rhythmic masking release in monkey primary auditory cortex: implications for models of auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Yonatan I Fishman; Christophe Micheyl; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream integration and segregation.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-24

3.  Membrane potential dynamics of populations of cortical neurons during auditory streaming.

Authors:  Brandon J Farley; Arnaud J Noreña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Neural correlates of auditory scene analysis and perception.

Authors:  Kate L Christison-Lagay; Adam M Gifford; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Neuromagnetic correlates of streaming in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Christophe Micheyl; Jennifer R Melcher; André Rupp; Michael Scherg; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Cortical FMRI activation to sequences of tones alternating in frequency: relationship to perceived rate and streaming.

Authors:  E Courtenay Wilson; Jennifer R Melcher; Christophe Micheyl; Alexander Gutschalk; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Auditory stream segregation with cochlear implants: A preliminary report.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Anastasios Sarampalis; Sandra I Oba
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Streaming of vowel sequences based on fundamental frequency in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Nicolas Grimault; Eric W Healy; Jean-Christophe Béra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory stream segregation of iterated rippled noises by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Daniel E Shearer; Michelle R Molis; Keri O Bennett; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.