Literature DB >> 20658165

Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream integration and segregation.

Christophe Micheyl1, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

The perceptual organization of sound sequences into auditory streams involves the integration of sounds into one stream and the segregation of sounds into separate streams. "Objective" psychophysical measures of auditory streaming can be obtained using behavioral tasks where performance is facilitated by segregation and hampered by integration, or vice versa. Traditionally, these two types of tasks have been tested in separate studies involving different listeners, procedures, and stimuli. Here, we tested subjects in two complementary temporal-gap discrimination tasks involving similar stimuli and procedures. One task was designed so that performance in it would be facilitated by perceptual integration; the other, so that performance would be facilitated by perceptual segregation. Thresholds were measured in both tasks under a wide range of conditions produced by varying three stimulus parameters known to influence stream formation: frequency separation, tone-presentation rate, and sequence length. In addition to these performance-based measures, subjective judgments of perceived segregation were collected in the same listeners under corresponding stimulus conditions. The patterns of results obtained in the two temporal-discrimination tasks, and the relationships between thresholds and perceived-segregation judgments, were mostly consistent with the hypothesis that stream segregation helped performance in one task and impaired performance in the other task. The tasks and stimuli described here may prove useful in future behavioral or neurophysiological experiments, which seek to manipulate and measure neural correlates of auditory streaming while minimizing differences between the physical stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20658165      PMCID: PMC2975891          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-010-0227-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  73 in total

1.  Effects of similarity in bandwidth on the auditory sequential streaming of two-tone complexes.

Authors:  R Cusack; B Roberts
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Learning and generalization of auditory temporal-interval discrimination in humans.

Authors:  B A Wright; D V Buonomano; H W Mahncke; M M Merzenich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Computer simulation of auditory stream segregation in alternating-tone sequences.

Authors:  M W Beauvois; R Meddis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of temporal fringes on fundamental-frequency discrimination.

Authors:  C Micheyl; R P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sequential stream segregation in the absence of spectral cues.

Authors:  J Vliegen; A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Sense and the single neuron: probing the physiology of perception.

Authors:  A J Parker; W T Newsome
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Age effects on duration discrimination with simple and complex stimuli.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons; S Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory scene analysis by songbirds: stream segregation of birdsong by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  S H Hulse; S A MacDougall-Shackleton; A B Wisniewski
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Auditory scene analysis by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris): perceptual segregation of tone sequences.

Authors:  S A MacDougall-Shackleton; S H Hulse; T Q Gentner; W White
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory stream segregation in goldfish (Carassius auratus).

Authors:  R R Fay
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  40 in total

1.  Toward an objective measure for a "stream segregation" task.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Eva Maria Carreira; Yi Shen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The initial phase of auditory and visual scene analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Hupé; Daniel Pressnitzer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A method for evaluating the relation between sound source segregation and masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Neural correlates of auditory stream segregation: an analysis of onset- and change-related responses.

Authors:  Nicholas A Smith; Suyash Joshi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Neural correlates of attention and streaming in a perceptually multistable auditory illusion.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Ifat Yasin; Andrew J Oxenham; Shihab Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of frequency cueing on the perceptual segregation of simultaneous tones: Bottom-up and top-down contributions.

Authors:  Yi Shen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Animal models for auditory streaming.

Authors:  Naoya Itatani; Georg M Klump
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Stream segregation with high spatial acuity.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Zekiye A Onsan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory stream segregation of iterated rippled noises by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Daniel E Shearer; Michelle R Molis; Keri O Bennett; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Perceptual sensitivity to, and electrophysiological encoding of, a complex periodic signal: effects of age.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.