Literature DB >> 17594527

Blood gas measurements using the Bayer Rapid Point 405: are we basing our decisions on accurate data?

Frederic Sarrazin1, Michael J Tessler, Kenneth Kardash, Elizabeth McNamara, Christina Holcroft.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Therapeutic decisions in the Operating Room (OR) are often made based solely upon results obtained from arterial blood gas machines. We evaluated how precise and accurate the results obtained from Bayer Rapid Point 405 (RP405) were vis-à-vis those of our blood gas laboratory and if they met the standards of the members of the anesthesia department.
METHODS: About 3 ml of blood from an indwelling arterial catheter were drawn into a heparinized syringe (FIMS Portex Inc.) from each of 90 patients and immediately analyzed by two RP405 and the hospital's main blood gas machines (Instrumentation Laboratories GEM 3000). The remaining 2.8 ml of blood was used to measure Hematocrit and sent to the hospital's main biochemistry laboratory for electrolyte measurement using an indirect ion selective method (Roche Diagnostics Modular ISE Module). A survey was distributed to each of the 19 anesthesiologists at the Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital (JGH). Their opinions for accuracy and treatment thresholds for each of the 12 variables measured by the RP405 were sought.
RESULTS: For all measured variables, including pH, pCO2, pO2, potassium and Hematocrit, the correlation between the measurements from the RP405 and the gold standard were all above 95.5% with a p < 0.001. The survey results demonstrate that the machine gives results that are accurate within the acceptability frame expected by our staff anesthesiologists.
CONCLUSION: Anesthesiologists must be confident that the information they receive is accurate in the context of rapidly changing clinical status. Our results show that the RP405 analyzers produce reliable measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17594527     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-007-9082-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   1.977


  9 in total

1.  [Analytical evaluation of Rapidpoint 400 blood gas analyser].

Authors:  E Magny; M F Renard; J M Launay
Journal:  Ann Biol Clin (Paris)       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.459

2.  Comparison of blood gas and electrolyte test results from the Gem-Premier and the ABL-70 versus a conventional laboratory analyzer.

Authors:  Howard G Walton; David M Boucher; Rafael Marroquin
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2003-03

3.  Incorrect least-squares regression coefficients in method-comparison analysis.

Authors:  P J Cornbleet; N Gochman
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-10-21       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, Part I.

Authors:  H Passing
Journal:  J Clin Chem Clin Biochem       Date:  1983-11

7.  [The i-STAT analyzer. A new, hand-held device for the bedside determination of hematocrit, blood gases, and electrolytes].

Authors:  J Schneider; R Dudziak; K Westphal; J Vettermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Accuracy and precision of a new, portable, handheld blood gas analyzer, the IRMA.

Authors:  J A Wahr; W Lau; K K Tremper; L Hallock; K Smith
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1996-07

9.  Evaluation of the blood gas analyzer Gem PREMIER 3000.

Authors:  Bénédicte Bénéteau-Burnat; Marie-Chantal Bocque; Anne Lorin; Catherine Martin; Michel Vaubourdolle
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.694

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Are transcutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide determinations of value in pulmonary arterial hypertension?

Authors:  Adriano R Tonelli; Laith Alkukhun; Frank Cikach; Mostafa Ahmed; Raed A Dweik
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Non-invasive estimation of jugular venous oxygen saturation: a comparison between near infrared spectroscopy and transcutaneous venous oximetry.

Authors:  Douglas A Colquhoun; Jason M Tucker-Schwartz; Marcel E Durieux; Robert H Thiele
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Evaluation of a transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitor in patients with acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Antonello Nicolini; Maura Bravo Ferrari
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.219

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.