Literature DB >> 12680492

Comparison of blood gas and electrolyte test results from the Gem-Premier and the ABL-70 versus a conventional laboratory analyzer.

Howard G Walton1, David M Boucher, Rafael Marroquin.   

Abstract

Blood gas analyzers serve a critical role in providing information that reflects patient homeostasis. This study was undertaken to evaluate the accuracy, reliability, consistency, and bias of the Radiometer ABL-70 point of care blood gas analyzer. Thirty samples were gathered for analysis of pH, pCO2, pO2, sodium, potassium, sodium bicarbonate, and base excess. Twenty-nine samples were gathered for hematocrit, 31 for ionized calcium, and 33 for venous pO2 and saturations. The data were compared with the Gem-Premier point of care analyzer and the hospital blood gas machine and electrolyte analyzer. There was statistical significance between the pH, pCO2, sodium, potassium, calcium, hematocrit, and venous pO2 and saturations when comparing the ABL-70 with the Gem-Premier. When comparing the ABL-70 with the Corning 278/270 blood gas machine/Co-Ox, the AVL-9180, and the Dimension XL, there was statistical significance seen between the pH, pCO2, pO2, sodium, calcium, hematocrit, and base excess. Although this statistical significance was observed between the ABL-70 and the other analyzers, the significance was not of clinical importance. The ABL-70 demonstrated acceptable accuracy, reliability, consistency, and bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12680492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  5 in total

1.  In vitro comparison of the new in-line monitor BMU 40 versus a conventional laboratory analyzer.

Authors:  F Oliver Grosse; David Holzhey; Volkmar Falk; Jan Schaarschmidt; Klaus Kraemer; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2010-03

2.  Clinical evaluation of the ABL-77 for point-of-care analysis in the cardiovascular operating room.

Authors:  Jack S Prichard; John S French; Nestor Alvar
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2006-06

3.  Two different hematocrit detection methods: different methods, different results?

Authors:  Marco Bosshart; John F Stover; Reto Stocker; Lars M Asmis; Jörg Feige; Thomas A Neff; Reto A Schuepbach; Silvia R Cottini; Markus Béchir
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-03-09

4.  Blood gas measurements using the Bayer Rapid Point 405: are we basing our decisions on accurate data?

Authors:  Frederic Sarrazin; Michael J Tessler; Kenneth Kardash; Elizabeth McNamara; Christina Holcroft
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 1.977

5.  Accuracy of Potassium Measurement Using Blood Gas Analyzer.

Authors:  Hatim Mahmoud; Zied Jaffar; Yousef M Al Alawi; Fatimah Al Alsuhaimi; Mohammed A A Khoja; Muath A Al-Ahmadi; Abdullah M Alattas; Mohammed F Alhusayni; Mohammed E Mahroos; Muath A Alrehaili
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.