Literature DB >> 262186

Incorrect least-squares regression coefficients in method-comparison analysis.

P J Cornbleet, N Gochman.   

Abstract

The least-squares method is frequently used to calculate the slope and intercept of the best line through a set of data points. However, least-squares regression slopes and intercepts may be incorrect if the underlying assumptions of the least-squares model are not met. Two factors in particular that may result in incorrect least-squares regression coefficients are: (a) imprecision in the measurement of the independent (x-axis) variable and (b) inclusion of outliers in the data analysis. We compared the methods of Deming, Mandel, and Bartlett in estimating the known slope of a regression line when the independent variable is measured with imprecision, and found the method of Deming to be the most useful. Significant error in the least-squares slope estimation occurs when the ratio of the standard deviation of measurement of a single x value to the standard deviation of the x-data set exceeds 0.2. Errors in the least-squares coefficients attributable to outliers can be avoided by eliminating data points whose vertical distance from the regression line exceed four times the standard error the estimate.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 262186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  66 in total

1.  Monocyte counting: discrepancies in results obtained with different automated instruments.

Authors:  W Goossens; L Van Hove; R L Verwilghen
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Comparison of an immunochemical assay for plasma fibrinogen and a turbidimetric thrombin clotting technique to discriminate hyperlipidaemic patients from healthy controls.

Authors:  M L Knapp; M D Feher; H Carey; P D Mayne
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  The discordant method: a novel approach for differential correlation.

Authors:  Charlotte Siska; Russell Bowler; Katerina Kechris
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Clinical chemistry through Clinical Chemistry: a journal timeline.

Authors:  Robert Rej
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Multicenter evaluation of five commercial rubella virus immunoglobulin G kits which report in international units per milliliter.

Authors:  W Dimech; A Bettoli; D Eckert; B Francis; J Hamblin; T Kerr; C Ryan; I Skurrie
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Influence of accommodative lag upon the far-gradient measurement of accommodative convergence to accommodation ratio in strabismic patients.

Authors:  Manabu Miyata; Satoshi Hasebe; Hiroshi Ohtsuki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Cycloplegic effect of 0.5% tropicamide and 0.5% phenylephrine mixed eye drops: objective assessment in Japanese schoolchildren with myopia.

Authors:  Ichiro Hamasaki; Satoshi Hasebe; Shuhei Kimura; Manabu Miyata; Hiroshi Ohtsuki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Performance evaluation of ISFETs and other ISE sensors for whole blood ion assay.

Authors:  J M Thompson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Evaluation of a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging system for whole body composition analysis in rodents.

Authors:  Joshua P Nixon; Minzhi Zhang; ChuanFeng Wang; Michael A Kuskowski; Colleen M Novak; James A Levine; Charles J Billington; Catherine M Kotz
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 5.002

10.  A novel flow cytometric assay for the quantification of adhesion of subsets within a heterogeneous cell population; analysis of lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1)-mediated binding of bone marrow-derived primary tumour cells of patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  E J Ahsmann; R J Benschop; T D de Gruyl; J A Faber; H M Lokhorst; A C Bloem
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.