Literature DB >> 16812034

Conditioned reinforcement and choice.

J A Nevin, C Mandell.   

Abstract

In a series of three experiments, rats were exposed to successive schedule components arranged on two levers, in which lever pressing produced a light, and nose-key pressing produced water in 50% of the light periods. When one auditory signal was presented only during those light periods correlated with water on one lever, and a different signal was presented only during those light periods correlated with nonreinforcement on the other lever, the former lever was preferred in choice trials, and higher rates of responding were maintained on the former lever in nonchoice (forced) trials. Thus, the rats preferred a schedule component that included a conditioned reinforcer over one that did not, with the schedules of primary reinforcement and the information value of the signals equated. Preferences were maintained when one or the other of the auditory signals was deleted, but were not established in naive subjects when training began with either the positive or negative signal only. Discriminative control of nose-key pressing by the auditory signals was highly variable across subjects and was not correlated with choice.

Entities:  

Year:  1978        PMID: 16812034      PMCID: PMC1332814          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER; L R GOLLUB
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Secondary reinforcement as affected by reward schedule and the testing situation.

Authors:  M R D'AMATO; R LACHMAN; P KIVY
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1958-12

3.  A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; M P Browne; C E Lawrence
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Second-order schedules and the problem of conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Observing stimulus sources that signal food or no food.

Authors:  H M Jenkins; R A Boakes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Second-order schedules: discrimination of components.

Authors:  N Squires; J Norborg; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The correlation-based law of effect.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effects of required rates of responding upon choice.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The maintenance of conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  Trans N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1969-06
  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Substitutability between conditioned and primary reinforcers in discrimination acquisition.

Authors:  B A Williams; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice and conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino; D Freed; R A Preston; W A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Contingency and stimulus change in chained schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; R Yohalem; P J Silverman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  The effect of conditioned reinforcement rate on choice: a review.

Authors:  Edmund Fantino; Paul Romanowich
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Gambling in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): The effect of cues signaling risky choice outcomes.

Authors:  Travis R Smith; Michael J Beran; Michael E Young
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.986

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.