Literature DB >> 24935805

Haptic guidance of overt visual attention.

Alexandra List1, Lucica Iordanescu, Marcia Grabowecky, Satoru Suzuki.   

Abstract

Research has shown that information accessed from one sensory modality can influence perceptual and attentional processes in another modality. Here, we demonstrated a novel crossmodal influence of haptic-shape information on visual attention. Participants visually searched for a target object (e.g., an orange) presented among distractor objects, fixating the target as quickly as possible. While searching for the target, participants held (never viewed and out of sight) an item of a specific shape in their hands. In two experiments, we demonstrated that the time for the eyes to reach a target-a measure of overt visual attention-was reduced when the shape of the held item (e.g., a sphere) was consistent with the shape of the visual target (e.g., an orange), relative to when the held shape was unrelated to the target (e.g., a hockey puck) or when no shape was held. This haptic-to-visual facilitation occurred despite the fact that the held shapes were not predictive of the visual targets' shapes, suggesting that the crossmodal influence occurred automatically, reflecting shape-specific haptic guidance of overt visual attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24935805      PMCID: PMC4231009          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0696-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  34 in total

Review 1.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Aging and the visual, haptic, and cross-modal perception of natural object shape.

Authors:  J Farley Norman; Charles E Crabtree; Hideko F Norman; Brandon K Moncrief; Molly Herrmann; Noah Kapley
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view.

Authors:  J M Loomis; R L Klatzky; S J Lederman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Solid shape discrimination from vision and haptics: natural objects (Capsicum annuum) and Gibson's "feelies".

Authors:  J Farley Norman; Flip Phillips; Jessica S Holmin; Hideko F Norman; Amanda M Beers; Alexandria M Boswell; Jacob R Cheeseman; Angela G Stethen; Cecilia Ronning
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Interaction of vision and touch in conflict and nonconflict form perception tasks.

Authors:  E A Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-11

7.  The dominance of touch by vision: occurs with familiar objects.

Authors:  R P Power
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Characteristic sounds make you look at target objects more quickly.

Authors:  Lucica Iordanescu; Marcia Grabowecky; Steven Franconeri; Jan Theeuwes; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Cortical substrates supporting visual search in humans.

Authors:  M Eglin; L C Robertson; R T Knight
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory.

Authors:  David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  1 in total

1.  Characteristic Sounds Facilitate Object Search in Real-Life Scenes.

Authors:  Daria Kvasova; Laia Garcia-Vernet; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.