Literature DB >> 21425391

Common and distinct neural regions for the guidance of selection by visuoverbal information held in memory: converging evidence from fMRI and rTMS.

David Soto1, Pia Rotshtein, John Hodsoll, Carmel Mevorach, Glyn W Humphreys.   

Abstract

Recent research indicates that working memory (WM) and attention interact, with attention automatically biased to stimuli that match the contents of WM. Though there is behavioral evidence for verbal guidance (written words) as well as guidance by more visual cues in WM, we have limited understanding of how these two representational formats influence the guidance of visual selection at a neural level. Here, we present converging evidence from functional MRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which indicates that both common and distinct neural regions mediate the influence of visuoverbal representations on WM. Colored shapes, but not words, in WM activated the superior frontal gyrus (SFG) and recognition memory areas in the temporal lobe when the contents of WM matched a stimulus in a subsequent search display. rTMS to the SFG disrupted WM effects from colored shapes. The lateral occipital cortex, however, tended to be more activated with written word cues, and rTMS to the lateral occipital complex tended to disrupt effects from written words more than from colored shapes in WM. There was also evidence for cue validity effects from colored shapes and written stimuli operating through different subthalamic nuclei. We discuss the evidence for understanding the neural systems mediating attention effects from WM.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21425391      PMCID: PMC6869860          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  50 in total

1.  Effects of similarity and history on neural mechanisms of visual selection.

Authors:  N P Bichot; J D Schall
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses.

Authors:  K J Friston; A P Holmes; C J Price; C Büchel; K J Worsley
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; M H Buonocore; G R Mangun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  The metamodal organization of the brain.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; R Hamilton
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Optimized EPI for fMRI studies of the orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  R Deichmann; J A Gottfried; C Hutton; R Turner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Studies in cognition: the problems solved and created by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  E M Robertson; H Théoret; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Frank Meijer; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Top-down effects of semantic knowledge in visual search are modulated by cognitive but not perceptual load.

Authors:  Eva Belke; Glyn W Humphreys; Derrick G Watson; Antje S Meyer; Anna L Telling
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-11

9.  Cue-invariant activation in object-related areas of the human occipital lobe.

Authors:  K Grill-Spector; T Kushnir; S Edelman; Y Itzchak; R Malach
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Seeing the content of the mind: enhanced awareness through working memory in patients with visual extinction.

Authors:  David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  10 in total

1.  Distinct causal mechanisms of attentional guidance by working memory and repetition priming in early visual cortex.

Authors:  David Soto; Dafydd Llewelyn; Juha Silvanto
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.

Authors:  Pascasie L Dombert; Gereon R Fink; Simone Vossel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Learning and memory.

Authors:  Anna-Katharine Brem; Kathy Ran; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

Review 4.  Changing delay discounting in the light of the competing neurobehavioral decision systems theory: a review.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; David P Jarmolowicz; E Terry Mueller; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Distraction biases working memory for faces.

Authors:  Remington Mallett; Anurima Mummaneni; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

6.  The Competitive Influences of Perceptual Load and Working Memory Guidance on Selective Attention.

Authors:  Jinfeng Tan; Yuanfang Zhao; Lijun Wang; Xia Tian; Yan Cui; Qian Yang; Weigang Pan; Xiaoyue Zhao; Antao Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Exploring biased attention towards body-related stimuli and its relationship with body awareness.

Authors:  Gerardo Salvato; Gabriele De Maio; Gabriella Bottini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A parieto-medial temporal pathway for the strategic control over working memory biases in human visual attention.

Authors:  David Soto; Ciara M Greene; Anastasia Kiyonaga; Clive R Rosenthal; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The temporal dynamics of visual working memory guidance of selective attention.

Authors:  Jinfeng Tan; Yuanfang Zhao; Shanshan Wu; Lijun Wang; Glenn Hitchman; Xia Tian; Ming Li; Li Hu; Antao Chen
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Evaluating the Role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Posterior Parietal Cortex in Memory-Guided Attention With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Min Wang; Ping Yang; Chaoyang Wan; Zhenlan Jin; Junjun Zhang; Ling Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.