Literature DB >> 17533890

The spread of the phonological neighborhood influences spoken word recognition.

Michael S Vitevitch1.   

Abstract

In three experiments, the processing of words that had the same overall number of neighbors but varied in the spread of the neighborhood (i.e., the number of individual phonemes that could be changed to form real words) was examined. In an auditory lexical decision task, a naming task, and a same-different task, words in which changes at only two phoneme positions formed neighbors were responded to more quickly than words in which changes at all three phoneme positions formed neighbors. Additional analyses ruled out an account based on the computationally derived uniqueness points of the words. Although previous studies (e.g., Luce & Pisoni, 1998) have shown that the number of phonological neighbors influences spoken word recognition, the present results show that the nature of the relationship of the neighbors to the target word--as measured by the spread of the neighborhood--also influences spoken word recognition. The implications of this result for models of spoken word recognition are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17533890      PMCID: PMC2553701          DOI: 10.3758/bf03195952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

Authors:  D Norris; J M McQueen; A Cutler
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN.

Authors:  P A Luce; S D Goldinger; E T Auer; M S Vitevitch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

3.  When is all understood and done? The psychological reality of the recognition point.

Authors:  Jens Bölte; Mechtild Uhe
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Naturalistic and experimental analyses of word frequency and neighborhood density effects in slips of the ear.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.500

5.  N-watch: a program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics.

Authors:  Colin J Davis
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-02

6.  A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

7.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: effects of letter delay and nonword context difficulty.

Authors:  K R Pugh; K Rexer; M Peter; L Katz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm.

Authors:  F Grosjean
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-10

10.  A cohort model of visual word recognition.

Authors:  N F Johnson; K R Pugh
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  14 in total

1.  The spread and density of the phonological neighborhood can strongly influence the verbal transformation illusion.

Authors:  James A Bashford; Richard M Warren; Peter W Lenz
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2009-07-06

2.  Observing neighborhood effects without neighbors.

Authors:  Lidia Suárez; Seok Hui Tan; Melvin J Yap; Winston D Goh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

3.  The phonotactic influence on the perception of a consonant cluster /pt/ by native English and native Polish listeners: a behavioral and event related potential (ERP) study.

Authors:  Monica Wagner; Valerie L Shafer; Brett Martin; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  The Aging Neighborhood: Phonological Density in Naming.

Authors:  Jean K Gordon; Jake C Kurczek
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2014-01-01

5.  Complex network structure influences processing in long-term and short-term memory.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Kit Ying Chan; Steven Roodenrys
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Clustering coefficients of lexical neighborhoods: Does neighborhood structure matter in spoken word recognition?

Authors:  Nicholas Altieri; Thomas Gruenenfelder; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Ment Lex       Date:  2010-11-01

7.  Competition and cooperation among similar representations: toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Kit Ying Chan; Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The lexical restructuring hypothesis and graph theoretic analyses of networks based on random lexicons.

Authors:  Thomas M Gruenenfelder; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Insights into failed lexical retrieval from network science.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Kit Ying Chan; Rutherford Goldstein
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.