Literature DB >> 21297885

The spread and density of the phonological neighborhood can strongly influence the verbal transformation illusion.

James A Bashford, Richard M Warren, Peter W Lenz.   

Abstract

When a recorded verbal stimulus repeats over and over, adaptation occurs and listeners hear competing forms. Reports of these "verbal transformations" (VTs) were obtained for 36 consonant-vowel (CV) syllables that varied both in frequency-weighted neighborhood density (ranging from 12.73 to 90.42) and in neighborhood spread [i.e., for 18 CVs, changes at either phoneme position could yield real words (spread = 2) while for the remaining 18 CVs, changes at only one position could yield words (spread = 1)]. The strength of the VT illusion, measured by the amount of time the stimuli were heard nonveridically during the 300-s repetition period, decreased substantially with both increasing neighborhood density [r=-0.74, F(1,34)=42.6, p<0.0001] and increasing spread [r=-0.75, F(1,34) = 44.1, p<0.0001]. Stepwise regression revealed that density and spread collectively accounted for approximately 70% of the variance in illusion strength [F(1,33)>=10.0, p<0.003 or better]. These effects are larger than, but generally consistent with, neighborhood effects obtained with other psycholinguistic tasks, and they suggest that VTs can provide a highly sensitive measure of lexical competition. [Work supported by NIH.].

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21297885      PMCID: PMC3032273          DOI: 10.1121/1.3186738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust


  12 in total

1.  Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

Authors:  D Norris; J M McQueen; A Cutler
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN.

Authors:  P A Luce; S D Goldinger; E T Auer; M S Vitevitch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

3.  An auditory analogue of the visual reversible figure.

Authors:  R M WARREN; R L GREGORY
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1958-09

4.  Polling the effective neighborhoods of spoken words with the verbal transformation effect.

Authors:  James A Bashford; Richard M Warren; Peter W Lenz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Evoking biphone neighborhoods with verbal transformations: illusory changes demonstrate both lexical competition and inhibition.

Authors:  James A Bashford; Richard M Warren; Peter W Lenz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Similarity neighborhoods of spoken two-syllable words: retroactive effects on multiple activation.

Authors:  M S Cluff; P A Luce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Lexical neighborhood effects in phonetic processing.

Authors:  R S Newman; J R Sawusch; P A Luce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Priming Lexical Neighbors of Spoken Words: Effects of Competition and Inhibition.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Paul A Luce; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  1989-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.