Literature DB >> 19968444

The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition.

Kit Ying Chan1, Michael S Vitevitch.   

Abstract

Clustering coefficient-a measure derived from the new science of networks-refers to the proportion of phonological neighbors of a target word that are also neighbors of each other. Consider the words bat, hat, and can, all of which are neighbors of the word cat; the words bat and hat are also neighbors of each other. In a perceptual identification task, words with a low clustering coefficient (i.e., few neighbors are neighbors of each other) were more accurately identified than words with a high clustering coefficient (i.e., many neighbors are neighbors of each other). In a lexical decision task, words with a low clustering coefficient were responded to more quickly than words with a high clustering coefficient. These findings suggest that the structure of the lexicon (i.e., the similarity relationships among neighbors of the target word measured by clustering coefficient) influences lexical access in spoken word recognition. Simulations of the TRACE and Shortlist models of spoken word recognition failed to account for the present findings. A framework for a new model of spoken word recognition is proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19968444      PMCID: PMC2791911          DOI: 10.1037/a0016902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  40 in total

1.  The subjects as a simple random effect fallacy: subject variability and morphological family effects in the mental lexicon.

Authors:  R Harald Baayen; Fiona J Tweedie; Robert Schreuder
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  N-watch: a program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics.

Authors:  Colin J Davis
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-02

3.  A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

4.  Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jonna Armbrüster; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  The curious case of competition in Spanish speech production.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Melissa K Stamer
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2006

6.  Priming Lexical Neighbors of Spoken Words: Effects of Competition and Inhibition.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Paul A Luce; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  1989-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

9.  Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: will we be able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990?

Authors:  A Cutler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1981 Aug-Dec

10.  The small world of human language.

Authors:  R Ferrer I Cancho; R V Solé
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  34 in total

1.  Spatially constrained adaptive rewiring in cortical networks creates spatially modular small world architectures.

Authors:  Nicholas Jarman; Chris Trengove; Erik Steur; Ivan Tyukin; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Observing neighborhood effects without neighbors.

Authors:  Lidia Suárez; Seok Hui Tan; Melvin J Yap; Winston D Goh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

3.  The Aging Neighborhood: Phonological Density in Naming.

Authors:  Jean K Gordon; Jake C Kurczek
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2014-01-01

4.  Complex network structure influences processing in long-term and short-term memory.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Kit Ying Chan; Steven Roodenrys
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  The influence of 2-hop network density on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Cynthia S Q Siew
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

6.  How humans learn and represent networks.

Authors:  Christopher W Lynn; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Contributions of modern network science to the cognitive sciences: revisiting research spirals of representation and process.

Authors:  Nichol Castro; Cynthia S Q Siew
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.704

8.  Phonological similarity influences word learning in adults learning Spanish as a foreign language.

Authors:  Melissa K Stamer; Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2012-07-01

Review 9.  Using network science in the language sciences and clinic.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Nichol Castro
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.484

10.  How children explore the phonological network in child-directed speech: A survival analysis of children's first word productions.

Authors:  Matthew T Carlson; Morgan Sonderegger; Max Bane
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.