Literature DB >> 21423865

Clustering coefficients of lexical neighborhoods: Does neighborhood structure matter in spoken word recognition?

Nicholas Altieri1, Thomas Gruenenfelder, David B Pisoni.   

Abstract

High neighborhood density reduces the speed and accuracy of spoken word recognition. The two studies reported here investigated whether Clustering Coefficient (CC) - a graph theoretic variable measuring the degree to which a word's neighbors are neighbors of one another, has similar effects on spoken word recognition. In Experiment 1, we found that high CC words were identified less accurately when spectrally degraded than low CC words. In Experiment 2, using a word repetition procedure, we observed longer response latencies for high CC words compared to low CC words. Taken together, the results of both studies indicate that higher CC leads to slower and less accurate spoken word recognition. The results are discussed in terms of activation-plus-competition models of spoken word recognition.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21423865      PMCID: PMC3060033          DOI: 10.1075/ml.5.1.01alt

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ment Lex        ISSN: 1871-1340


  21 in total

1.  Emergence of scaling in random networks

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The neighborhood distribution effect in visual word recognition: words with single and twin neighbors.

Authors:  S Mathey; D Zagar
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Language as an evolving word web.

Authors:  S N Dorogovtsev; J F Mendes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

Review 5.  Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition.

Authors:  Dennis Norris; James M McQueen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: effects of letter delay and nonword context difficulty.

Authors:  K R Pugh; K Rexer; M Peter; L Katz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The small world of human language.

Authors:  R Ferrer I Cancho; R V Solé
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Are there really interactive processes in speech perception?

Authors:  James M McQueen; Dennis Norris; Anne Cutler
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Chelsea Bates; Michael S Harris; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  How children explore the phonological network in child-directed speech: A survival analysis of children's first word productions.

Authors:  Matthew T Carlson; Morgan Sonderegger; Max Bane
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.059

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.