Literature DB >> 22352357

Competition and cooperation among similar representations: toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors.

Qi Chen1, Daniel Mirman.   

Abstract

One of the core principles of how the mind works is the graded, parallel activation of multiple related or similar representations. Parallel activation of multiple representations has been particularly important in the development of theories and models of language processing, where coactivated representations (neighbors) have been shown to exhibit both facilitative and inhibitory effects on word recognition and production. Researchers generally ascribe these effects to interactive activation and competition, but there is no unified explanation for why the effects are facilitative in some cases and inhibitory in others. We present a series of simulations of a simple domain-general interactive activation and competition model that is broadly consistent with more specialized domain-specific models of lexical processing. The results showed that interactive activation and competition can indeed account for the complex pattern of reversals. Critically, the simulations revealed a core computational principle that determines whether neighbor effects are facilitative or inhibitory: strongly active neighbors exert a net inhibitory effect, and weakly active neighbors exert a net facilitative effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22352357      PMCID: PMC3328653          DOI: 10.1037/a0027175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  60 in total

1.  Phonotactics, neighborhood activation, and lexical access for spoken words.

Authors:  M S Vitevitch; P A Luce; D B Pisoni; E T Auer
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1999 Jun 1-15       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Sublexical or lexical effects on serial recall of nonwords?

Authors:  Steven Roodenrys; Melinda Hinton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition.

Authors:  J Grainger; J K O'Regan; A M Jacobs; J Segui
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-01

4.  Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; James S Magnuson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Effects of near and distant semantic neighbors on word production.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Lexical neighborhood effects in phonetic processing.

Authors:  R S Newman; J R Sawusch; P A Luce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Priming Lexical Neighbors of Spoken Words: Effects of Competition and Inhibition.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Paul A Luce; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  1989-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Population of linear experts: knowledge partitioning and function learning.

Authors:  Michael L Kalish; Stephan Lewandowsky; John K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Toward an integrated account of object and action selection: a computational analysis and empirical findings from reaching-to-grasp and tool-use.

Authors:  Matthew M Botvinick; Laurel J Buxbaum; Lauren M Bylsma; Steven A Jax
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-11-30       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  39 in total

1.  The effect of orthographic and emotional neighbourhood in a colour categorization task.

Authors:  Anna-Malika Camblats; Stéphanie Mathey
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-11-09

2.  So many options, so little control: abstract representations can reduce selection demands to increase children's self-directed flexibility.

Authors:  Hannah R Snyder; Yuko Munakata
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2013-08-31

3.  Lesions to the left lateral prefrontal cortex impair decision threshold adjustment for lexical selection.

Authors:  Royce Anders; Stéphanie Riès; Leendert Van Maanen; F-Xavier Alario
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Interaction between phonological and semantic representations: time matters.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-08-23

5.  Real-time lexical comprehension in young children learning American Sign Language.

Authors:  Kyle MacDonald; Todd LaMarr; David Corina; Virginia A Marchman; Anne Fernald
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2018-04-16

6.  Altered language network activity in young people at familial high-risk for schizophrenia.

Authors:  H W Thermenos; S Whitfield-Gabrieli; L J Seidman; G Kuperberg; R J Juelich; S Divatia; C Riley; G A Jabbar; M E Shenton; M Kubicki; T Manschreck; M S Keshavan; L E DeLisi
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Does segmental overlap help or hurt? Evidence from blocked cyclic naming in spoken and written production.

Authors:  Bonnie Breining; Nazbanou Nozari; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

8.  Verbal working memory and linguistic long-term memory: Exploring the lexical cohort effect.

Authors:  Benjamin Kowialiewski; Steve Majerus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-07

9.  Lexical processing depends on sublexical processing: Evidence from the visual world paradigm and aphasia.

Authors:  Heather R Dial; Bob McMurray; Randi C Martin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Theoretical analysis of word production deficits in adult aphasia.

Authors:  Myrna F Schwartz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.