Literature DB >> 12866911

Naturalistic and experimental analyses of word frequency and neighborhood density effects in slips of the ear.

Michael S Vitevitch1.   

Abstract

A comparison of the lexical characteristics of 88 auditory misperceptions (i.e., slips of the ear) showed no difference in word-frequency, neighborhood density, and neighborhood frequency between the actual and the perceived utterances. Another comparison of slip of the ear tokens (i.e., actual and perceived utterances) and words in general (i.e., randomly selected from the lexicon) showed that slip of the ear tokens had denser neighborhoods and higher neighborhood frequency than words in general, as predicted from laboratory studies. Contrary to prediction, slip of the ear tokens were higher in frequency of occurrence than words in general. Additional laboratory-based investigations examined the possible source of the contradictory word frequency finding, highlighting the importance of using naturalistic and experimental data to develop models of spoken language processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12866911      PMCID: PMC2542844          DOI: 10.1177/00238309020450040501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  38 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  The perceptual redintegration of frequent and infrequent words.

Authors:  P L NEWBIGGING
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1961-09

3.  Frequency of usage as a determinant of recognition thresholds for words.

Authors:  R L SOLOMON; L POSTMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1952-03

4.  Repair strategy usage by hearing-impaired adults and changes following communication therapy.

Authors:  N Tye-Murray
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-08

5.  Test of Response Bias Explanation of Word-Frequency Effect.

Authors:  C R Brown; H Rubenstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-01-27       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Initial evaluation of an interactive test of sentence gist recognition.

Authors:  N Tye-Murray; S Witt; J Castelloe
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Response latencies in naming objects.

Authors:  R C Oldfield; A Wingfield
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm.

Authors:  F Grosjean
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-10

10.  On the nature of rate-dependent processing during phonetic perception.

Authors:  J L Miller; I L Aibel; K Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-01
View more
  19 in total

1.  The influence of sublexical and lexical representations on the processing of spoken words in English.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jonna Armbrüster; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The spread of the phonological neighborhood influences spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

4.  Phonotactic probability effects in children who stutter.

Authors:  Julie D Anderson; Courtney T Byrd
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Neighborhood effects in spelling in adults.

Authors:  Sébastien Roux; Patrick Bonin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

6.  Neighborhood density effects in spoken word recognition in Spanish.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Eva Rodríguez
Journal:  J Multiling Commun Disord       Date:  2004

7.  Misperceptions of spoken words: data from a random sample of American English words.

Authors:  Robert Albert Felty; Adam Buchwald; Thomas M Gruenenfelder; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The curious case of competition in Spanish speech production.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Melissa K Stamer
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2006

9.  What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical retrieval?

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Kit Ying Chan; Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.