Literature DB >> 17484428

Task switching is not cue switching.

Erik M Altmann1.   

Abstract

With the aim of reducing cognitive control in task switching to simpler processes, researchers have proposed in a series of recent studies that there is little more to switching tasks than switching cues. The present study addresses three questions concerning this reduction hypothesis. First, does switching cues account for all relevant variance associated with switching tasks? Second, how well does this hypothesis generalize beyond the experimental procedure from which it was developed? Third, how well does this new procedure preserve relevant measures such as task-switch cost? The answers (no; not very; not very) suggest that task switching does not reduce to cue switching.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17484428     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  17 in total

1.  Response repetition benefits and costs.

Authors:  T Kleinsorge
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-12

2.  Automatic and intentional activation of task sets.

Authors:  I Koch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Functional decay of memory for tasks.

Authors:  Erik M Altmann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2002-08-15

4.  Limitations in advance task preparation: switching the relevant stimulus dimension in speeded same-different comparisons.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Hadas Marciano
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

5.  Advance preparation in task switching: what work is being done?

Authors:  Erik M Altmann
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-09

6.  The preparation effect in task switching: carryover of SOA.

Authors:  Erik M Altmann
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-01

7.  Very clever homunculus: compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Claus Bundesen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

8.  Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

9.  Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?

Authors:  Stephen Monsell; Guy A Mizon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Current task activation predicts general effects of advance preparation in task switching.

Authors:  Edita Poljac; Ab de Haan; Gerard P van Galen
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2006
View more
  11 in total

1.  The surface structure and the deep structure of sequential control: what can we learn from task span switch costs?

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

2.  Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): a theoretical framework for task switching.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Yoav Kessler; Esther Adi-Japha
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-03-19

3.  Influence of display type and cue format on task-cuing effects: dissociating switch cost and right-left prevalence effects.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Iring Koch; Kim-Phuong L Vu; Motonori Yamaguchi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-07

4.  Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?

Authors:  James A Grange; George Houghton
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-09

5.  The role of attentional networks in voluntary task switching.

Authors:  Catherine M Arrington; Melissa M Yates
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

6.  Task-switching performance with 1:1 and 2:1 cue-task mappings: not so different after all.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Task switching with a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping: separating cue disambiguation from task-rule retrieval.

Authors:  Thomas Kleinsorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-05-27

8.  Hierarchical task organization in dual tasks: evidence for higher level task representations.

Authors:  Patricia Hirsch; Sophie Nolden; Andrea M Philipp; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-03-11

9.  Selecting a response in task switching: testing a model of compound cue retrieval.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Evidence for a multicomponent hierarchical representation of dual tasks.

Authors:  Patricia Hirsch; Clara Roesch; Iring Koch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.