Literature DB >> 15078052

The preparation effect in task switching: carryover of SOA.

Erik M Altmann1.   

Abstract

A common finding in task-switching studies is switch preparation (commonly known as the preparation effect), in which a longer interval between task cue and trial stimulus (i.e., a longer stimulus onset asynchrony, or SOA) reduces the cost of switching to a different task. Three experiments link switch preparation to within-subjects manipulations of SOA. In Experiment 1, SOA was randomized within subjects, producing switch preparation that was more pronounced when the SOA switched from the previous trial than when the SOA repeated. In Experiment 2, SOA was blocked within subjects, producing switch preparation but not on the first block of trials. In Experiment 3, SOA was manipulated between subjects with sufficient statistical power to detect switch preparation, but the effect was absent. The results favor an encoding view of cognitive control, but show that any putative switching mechanism reacts lazily when exposed to only one SOA.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15078052     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  35 in total

1.  Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition.

Authors:  U Mayr; S W Keele
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-03

2.  Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration.

Authors:  M H Sohn; R A Carlson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Automatic and intentional activation of task sets.

Authors:  I Koch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Power analysis for multivariate and repeated measures designs: a flexible approach using the SPSS MANOVA procedure.

Authors:  E J D'Amico; T B Neilands; R Zambarano
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2001-11

5.  Processes underlying long-term repetition priming in digit data entry.

Authors:  C J Buck-Gengler; A F Healy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Modeling cognitive control in task-switching.

Authors:  N Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2000

7.  Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations.

Authors:  R De Jong; E Berendsen; R Cools
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-04

8.  Limitations in advance task preparation: switching the relevant stimulus dimension in speeded same-different comparisons.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Hadas Marciano
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

9.  Tasks of a feather flock together: similarity effects in task switching.

Authors:  Catherine M Arrington; Erik M Altmann; Thomas H Carr
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-07

10.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12
View more
  20 in total

1.  Pending intentions: effects of prospective task encoding on the performance of another task.

Authors:  Thomas Kleinsorge; Patrick D Gajewski
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-04-26

2.  Sequential task predictability in task switching.

Authors:  Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

3.  Repetition priming in task switching: do the benefits dissipate?

Authors:  Erik M Altmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

4.  Preparatory adjustment of cognitive control in the task switching paradigm.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

5.  Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Alan Allport
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

6.  Effects of precuing horizontal and vertical dimensions on right-left prevalence.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Iring Koch; Kim-Phuong L Vu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

7.  Task switching is not cue switching.

Authors:  Erik M Altmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

8.  Influence of display type and cue format on task-cuing effects: dissociating switch cost and right-left prevalence effects.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Iring Koch; Kim-Phuong L Vu; Motonori Yamaguchi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-07

9.  The effect of stimulus availability on task choice in voluntary task switching.

Authors:  Catherine M Arrington
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-07

10.  Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?

Authors:  James A Grange; George Houghton
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.