Literature DB >> 15732691

Very clever homunculus: compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure.

Gordon D Logan1, Claus Bundesen.   

Abstract

In two experiments, subjects were given arbitrary letter cues or meaningful word cues that specified the task to be performed on a subsequent target stimulus. Letter and word cues were presented in separate blocks. There were two cues of each type for each task. Three kinds of transitions separated tasks: cue repetitions, in which both the cue and the task repeated; task repetitions, in which the cue changed but the task repeated; and task alternations, in which both the cue and the task changed. Responses were faster for cue than for task repetitions for both cue types. With word cues, task repetitions were not reliably faster than task alternations. With letter cues, task repetitions were reliably faster than task alternations in the first block but not in the second block. The results suggest that subjects responded to the compound of the cue and the target rather than switching task set between trials.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15732691     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  6 in total

1.  Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations.

Authors:  G D Logan; R D Gordon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs.

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Task switching.

Authors:  Stephen Monsell
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Clever homunculus: is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure?

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Claus Bundesen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  A theory of visual attention.

Authors:  C Bundesen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  The cuing and priming of cognitive operations.

Authors:  P Sudevan; D A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.332

  6 in total
  26 in total

Review 1.  The many faces of preparatory control in task switching: reviewing a decade of fMRI research.

Authors:  Hannes Ruge; Sharna Jamadar; Uta Zimmermann; Frini Karayanidis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-07

3.  Involuntary retrieval in alphabet-arithmetic tasks: task-mixing and task-switching costs.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Wolfgang Prinz; Alan Allport
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-06-26

4.  Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit task-cuing procedure.

Authors:  Catherine M Arrington; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

5.  The time it takes to switch attention.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

6.  Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Alan Allport
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

7.  Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

8.  Priming or executive control? Associative priming of cue encoding increases "switch costs" in the explicit task-cuing procedure.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Darryl W Schneider
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-09

9.  What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: tasks or cues?

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

10.  Extensive practice does not eliminate human switch costs.

Authors:  Gijsbert Stoet; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.