Literature DB >> 10668302

Response repetition benefits and costs.

T Kleinsorge1.   

Abstract

In a wide variety of tasks, choice reaction time (RT) is reduced for repetitions of the previous response. However, when the task itself or a relevant physical feature that successive trials have in common changes, costs for response repetitions can be observed. In a series of three experiments it was investigated whether the repetition of a response results in costs if the stimulus category changes. Furthermore, it was asked whether there need to be informative physical task features that successive trials have in common to produce response repetition costs. In alternating runs, participants had to respond to either one of four symbols or one of the letters with a binary choice reaction: Results suggest that a change of stimulus category is a sufficient condition to produce response repetition costs. It is hypothesized that any change of a task feature that is part of the task representation participants adopt leads to a disruption of repetition-based facilitation and tends to facilitate a response alternation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10668302     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00047-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  23 in total

1.  Response execution, selection, or activation: what is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?

Authors:  Ronald Hübner; Michel D Druey
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-07

2.  Multiple response codes play specific roles in response selection and inhibition under task switching.

Authors:  Ronald Hübner; Michel D Druey
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-05-30

3.  Response inhibition under task switching: its strength depends on the amount of task-irrelevant response activation.

Authors:  Michel D Druey; Ronald Hübner
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-09-28

4.  Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): a theoretical framework for task switching.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Yoav Kessler; Esther Adi-Japha
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-03-19

5.  Task switching is not cue switching.

Authors:  Erik M Altmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

6.  Task switching: effects of practice on switch and mixing costs.

Authors:  Tilo Strobach; Roman Liepelt; Torsten Schubert; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-03-01

7.  Why free choices take longer than forced choices: evidence from response threshold manipulations.

Authors:  Christoph Naefgen; Michael Dambacher; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-03

8.  Local and global level-priming occurs for hierarchical stimuli composed of outlined, but not filled-in, elements.

Authors:  Alexandra List; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Flanker compatibility effects in patients with Parkinson's disease: impact of target onset delay and trial-by-trial stimulus variation.

Authors:  Xavier E Cagigas; J Vincent Filoteo; John L Stricker; Laurie M Rilling; Frances J Friedrich
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching.

Authors:  Matthew C Davidson; Dima Amso; Loren Cruess Anderson; Adele Diamond
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.