Literature DB >> 18350316

Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): a theoretical framework for task switching.

Nachshon Meiran1, Yoav Kessler, Esther Adi-Japha.   

Abstract

Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS) is a modeling framework for task-switching experiments, which considers action-related effects as critical constraints. It assumes that control operates by choosing control parameter values, representing input selection and action representation. Competing CARIS models differ in whether (a) control parameters are determined by current instructions or represent a perseveration, (b) current instructions apply to the input selection and/or to action representation. According to the chosen model (a) task execution results in a default bias in favor of the executed task thus creating perseverative tendencies; (b) control counteracts these tendencies by applying a transient momentary bias whose locus (input selection or action representation) changes as a function of task preparation time; (c) this happens because the task-cue (e.g., SHAPE) initially attracts attention to the immediately available cue-information (e.g., target shape) and then attracts it to inferred or retrieved information (e.g., "circle" is related to the right key press).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18350316     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0136-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  76 in total

1.  Modeling cognitive control in task-switching.

Authors:  N Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2000

2.  Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval.

Authors:  U Mayr; R Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  When the same response has different meanings: recoding the response meaning in the lateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Marcel Brass; Hannes Ruge; Nachshon Meiran; Orit Rubin; Iring Koch; Stefan Zysset; Wolfgang Prinz; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Limitations in advance task preparation: switching the relevant stimulus dimension in speeded same-different comparisons.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Hadas Marciano
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

5.  Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

6.  Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Alan Allport
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

7.  Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Andrea M Philipp; Pierre Jolicoeur; Michael Falkenstein; Iring Koch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The performance of young schizophrenics and young normals on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.

Authors:  E T FEY
Journal:  J Consult Psychol       Date:  1951-08

9.  The cuing and priming of cognitive operations.

Authors:  P Sudevan; D A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Task set switching in schizophrenia.

Authors:  N Meiran; J Levine; N Meiran; A Henik
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  37 in total

1.  The impact of task rules on distracter processing: automatic categorization of irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  Renate Reisenauer; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-01-18

2.  Differential roles of inferior frontal and inferior parietal cortex in task switching: evidence from stimulus-categorization switching and response-modality switching.

Authors:  Andrea M Philipp; Ralph Weidner; Iring Koch; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  The many faces of preparatory control in task switching: reviewing a decade of fMRI research.

Authors:  Hannes Ruge; Sharna Jamadar; Uta Zimmermann; Frini Karayanidis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Task conflict effect in task switching.

Authors:  Ami Braverman; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-03-23

5.  Proactive control of irrelevant task rules during cued task switching.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-07-28

6.  Cue response dissociates inhibitory processes: task identity information is related to backward inhibition but not to competitor rule suppression.

Authors:  Shirley Regev; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-13

7.  Task switching among two or four tasks: effects of a short-term variation of the number of candidate tasks.

Authors:  Thomas Kleinsorge; Juliane Scheil
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-13

8.  A role for recency of response conflict in producing the bivalency effect.

Authors:  John G Grundy; Judith M Shedden
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-10-22

9.  The bivalency effect: adjustment of cognitive control without response set priming.

Authors:  Alodie Rey-Mermet; Beat Meier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-02-24

10.  Shifting the set of stimulus selection when switching between tasks.

Authors:  Mike Wendt; Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.