Literature DB >> 19210085

Selecting a response in task switching: testing a model of compound cue retrieval.

Darryl W Schneider1, Gordon D Logan.   

Abstract

How can a task-appropriate response be selected for an ambiguous target stimulus in task-switching situations? One answer is to use compound cue retrieval, whereby stimuli serve as joint retrieval cues to select a response from long-term memory. In the present study, the authors tested how well a model of compound cue retrieval could account for a complex pattern of congruency effects arising from a procedure in which a cue, prime, and target were presented on each trial. A comparison of alternative models of prime-based effects revealed that the best model was one in which all stimuli participated directly in the process of retrieving a response, validating previous modeling efforts. Relations to current theorizing about response congruency effects and models of response selection in task switching are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19210085      PMCID: PMC2667949          DOI: 10.1037/a0013744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  38 in total

1.  Automatic and intentional activation of task sets.

Authors:  I Koch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Task preparation and task repetition: two-component model of task switching.

Authors:  M H Sohn; J R Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-12

Review 3.  Task switching: a PDP model.

Authors:  Sam J Gilbert; Tim Shallice
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  An instance theory of attention and memory.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Modeling cognitive control in task-switching.

Authors:  N Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2000

6.  Clever homunculus: is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure?

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Claus Bundesen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit task-cuing procedure.

Authors:  Catherine M Arrington; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

9.  Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches.

Authors:  Stephen Monsell; Petroc Sumner; Helen Waters
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

10.  Inhibition of action rules.

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03
View more
  9 in total

1.  Learning a nonmediated route for response selection in task switching.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

2.  Task-switching performance with 1:1 and 2:1 cue-task mappings: not so different after all.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Automaticity without extensive training: the role of memory retrieval in implementation of task-defined rules.

Authors:  Motonori Yamaguchi; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

4.  Categorization difficulty modulates the mediated route for response selection in task switching.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

5.  A memory-based model of Hick's law.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; John R Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Modelling response selection in task switching: testing the contingent encoding assumption.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  What are task-sets: a single, integrated representation or a collection of multiple control representations?

Authors:  Dragan Rangelov; Thomas Töllner; Hermann J Müller; Michael Zehetleitner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Feature Integration and Task Switching: Diminished Switch Costs after Controlling for Stimulus, Response, and Cue Repetitions.

Authors:  James R Schmidt; Baptist Liefooghe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Exploring the Limitations of the Shielding Function of Categorization Rules in Task-Switching.

Authors:  Dong Guo; Bingxin Li; Yun Yu; Xuhong Liu; Xiangqian Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-05-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.