Literature DB >> 17473963

Risky communication: pitfalls in counseling about risk, and how to avoid them.

K O'Doherty1, G K Suthers.   

Abstract

A genetic counselor is often faced with the difficult task of conveying a set of complex and highly abstract factors associated with the client's risk of developing a familial disorder. The client is faced with the even more difficult task of making significant health-related decisions about an event which may or may not eventuate. Although there is a large corpus of research on this topic, much of the knowledge on risk communication is difficult to apply in a practical context. In this paper we draw together some insights on risk communication and decision-making under conditions of uncertainty, and apply them directly to the problem of communicating familial cancer risk. In particular, we focus on the distinction between individual risk and observed frequencies of adverse events, various framing effects, and contextualizing risk communication. We draw attention to some of the potential pitfalls in counseling about risk and offer avenues for circumventing them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17473963     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-006-9077-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  31 in total

Review 1.  Treating people with information: an analysis and review of approaches to communicating health risk information.

Authors:  A J Rothman; M T Kiviniemi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1999

2.  A qualitative study of the information needs of high-risk women undergoing prophylactic oophorectomy.

Authors:  N Hallowell
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 3.  Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures.

Authors:  Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn; Al Mulley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

4.  The language of uncertainty in genetic risk communication: framing and verbal versus numerical information.

Authors:  M Welkenhuysen; G Evers-Kiebooms; G d'Ydewalle
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2001-05

Review 5.  Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 1. Relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat.

Authors:  Alexandra Barratt; Peter C Wyer; Rose Hatala; Thomas McGinn; Antonio L Dans; Sheri Keitz; Virginia Moyer; Gordon Guyatt For
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  "Talking About Chance": The Presentation of Risk Information During Genetic Counseling for Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  N Hallowell; H Statham; F Murton; J Green; M Richards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  A systematic review on communicating with patients about evidence.

Authors:  Lyndal J Trevena; Heather M Davey; Alexandra Barratt; Phyllis Butow; Patrina Caldwell
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Perceived risk of breast cancer: influence of heuristic thinking.

Authors:  Noreen C Facione
Journal:  Cancer Pract       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct

9.  Colon cancer: risk perceptions and risk communication.

Authors:  Neil D Weinstein; Kathy Atwood; Elaine Puleo; Robert Fletcher; Graham Colditz; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

10.  The accuracy of patients' judgments of disease probability and test sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  R M Hamm; S L Smith
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Factors influencing intrafamilial communication of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic information.

Authors:  Gillian Nycum; Denise Avard; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Denise M Lautenbach; Kurt D Christensen; Jeffrey A Sparks; Robert C Green
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 8.929

3.  Young Women's Perceptions Regarding Communication with Healthcare Providers About Breast Cancer, Risk, and Prevention.

Authors:  Natasha Buchanan Lunsford; Karena F Sapsis; Betsy Smither; Jennifer Reynolds; Ben Wilburn; Temeika Fairley
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Genetic testing likelihood: the impact of abortion views and quality of life information on women's decisions.

Authors:  Jessica L Wilson; Gail M Ferguson; Judith M Thorn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  "It's not like judgment day": public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information.

Authors:  Erynn S Gordon; Georgia Griffin; Lisa Wawak; Hauchie Pang; Sarah E Gollust; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Patients' Medical and Psychosocial Experiences After Detection of a CDH1 Variant With Multigene Panel Testing.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Jessica M Long; Amanda C Brandt; Jamie Brower; Heather Symecko; Erin E Salo-Mullen; Stephanie N Christian; Tricia Harstad; Fergus J Couch; Judy E Garber; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-03-28

7.  Shared decision-making following disclosure of coronary heart disease genetic risk: results from a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Hayan Jouni; Raad A Haddad; Tariq S Marroush; Sherry-Ann Brown; Teresa M Kruisselbrink; Erin E Austin; Khader Shameer; Emma M Behnken; Rajeev Chaudhry; Victor M Montori; Iftikhar J Kullo
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Review of Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) for Prenatal and Pediatric Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Amanda Carré; Candice Empey
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Ethical issues of genetic susceptibility testing for occupational diseases: opinions of trainees in a high-risk job.

Authors:  M J Visser; M D F Rhebergen; S Kezic; F J H van Dijk; D L Willems; M M Verberk
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  The Scientific Foundation for personal genomics: recommendations from a National Institutes of Health-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention multidisciplinary workshop.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Colleen M McBride; Sheri D Schully; John P A Ioannidis; W Gregory Feero; A Cecile J W Janssens; Marta Gwinn; Denise G Simons-Morton; Jay M Bernhardt; Michele Cargill; Stephen J Chanock; George M Church; Ralph J Coates; Francis S Collins; Robert T Croyle; Barry R Davis; Gregory J Downing; Amy Duross; Susan Friedman; Mitchell H Gail; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Robert C Green; Mark H Greene; Philip Greenland; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Andro Hsu; Kathy L Hudson; Sharon L R Kardia; Paul L Kimmel; Michael S Lauer; Amy M Miller; Kenneth Offit; David F Ransohoff; J Scott Roberts; Rebekah S Rasooly; Kari Stefansson; Sharon F Terry; Steven M Teutsch; Angela Trepanier; Kay L Wanke; John S Witte; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.