Literature DB >> 11180583

A qualitative study of the information needs of high-risk women undergoing prophylactic oophorectomy.

N Hallowell1.   

Abstract

This qualitative study sought to determine the information needs of high-risk pre-menopausal women who had undergone prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy to manage their inherited risk of ovarian cancer. In-depth interviews were carried out with 23 high-risk women following surgery. Although the benefit of risk reduction was perceived as out weighing the costs of surgery, many women reported that they would have liked more information about the physical and emotional after-effects of oophorectomy prior to and following surgery. The analysis identified five different types of information needed by women making surgical decisions, comprising information about ovarian function and the menopause, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), surgical procedures, convalescence and the risk of inheriting a genetic mutation and developing cancer. It is suggested that, in addition to genetic counselling for hereditary ovarian cancer, women should receive information about both the costs and benefits of prophylactic oophorectomy, and should have access to gynaecology nurse specialists both before and after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11180583     DOI: 10.1002/1099-1611(200011/12)9:6<486::aid-pon478>3.0.co;2-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  17 in total

1.  Risky communication: pitfalls in counseling about risk, and how to avoid them.

Authors:  K O'Doherty; G K Suthers
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A pilot study of BRCA mutation carriers' knowledge about the clinical impact of prophylactic-oophorectomy and views on fertility consultation: a single-center pilot study.

Authors:  J Kim; C Skrzynia; J E Mersereau
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  S3-Guideline on Diagnostics, Therapy and Follow-up of Malignant Ovarian Tumours: Short version 1.0 - AWMF registration number: 032/035OL, June 2013.

Authors:  U Wagner; P Harter; F Hilpert; S Mahner; A Reuß; A du Bois; E Petru; W Meier; P Ortner; K König; K Lindel; D Grab; P Piso; O Ortmann; I Runnebaum; J Pfisterer; D Lüftner; N Frickhofen; F Grünwald; B O Maier; J Diebold; S Hauptmann; F Kommoss; G Emons; B Radeleff; M Gebhardt; N Arnold; G Calaminus; I Weisse; J Weis; J Sehouli; D Fink; A Burges; A Hasenburg; C Eggert
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Qualitative Evaluation of Medical Information Processing Needs of 60 Women Choosing Ovarian Cancer Surveillance or Prophylactic Oophorectomy.

Authors:  Sheri A Babb; Elizabeth M Swisher; Hope N Heller; Alison J Whelan; David G Mutch; Thomas J Herzog; Janet S Rader
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Preserving the self: the process of decision making about hereditary breast cancer and ovarian cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  A Fuchsia Howard; Lynda G Balneaves; Joan L Bottorff; Patricia Rodney
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-10-27

6.  Looking different, feeling different: women's reactions to risk-reducing breast and ovarian surgery.

Authors:  Nina Hallowell; Brandi Baylock; Louise Heiniger; Phyllis N Butow; Deepa Patel; Bettina Meiser; Christobel Saunders; Melanie A Price
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Catalysts to withdrawal from familial ovarian cancer screening for surgery and reactions to discontinued screening: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kate J Lifford; Alison Clements; Lindsay Fraser; Deborah Lancastle; Kate Brain
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Feasibility of an ovarian cancer quality-of-life psychoeducational intervention.

Authors:  Shirley Otis-Green; Betty Ferrell; Virginia Sun; Maren Spolum; Robert Morgan; Deborah Macdonald
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Experiences and decisions that motivate women at increased risk of breast cancer to participate in an experimental screening program.

Authors:  Michelle Proulx; Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Christine Loignon; Marie-Hélène Mayrand; Christine Maugard; Nathalie Bellavance; Diane Provencher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Quality of life and psychosexual adjustment after prophylactic oophorectomy for a family history of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  L Elit; M J Esplen; K Butler; S Narod
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.