Literature DB >> 10854457

Treating people with information: an analysis and review of approaches to communicating health risk information.

A J Rothman1, M T Kiviniemi.   

Abstract

The communication of risk information is a fundamental aspect of nearly all health promotion interventions. However, no consensus exists regarding the most effective way to provide people with risk information. We will review and evaluate the relative merits of two approaches to risk communication. One approach relies on the presentation of numerical information regarding the probability of a health problem occurring, whereas the other relies on the presentation of information about the antecedents and consequences of a health problem. Because people have considerable difficulty understanding and using quantitative information, the effectiveness of interventions that rely solely on numerical probability information has been limited. Interventions that provide people with a broader informational context in which to think about a health problem have had greater success systematically influencing perceptions of personal risk but have several important limitations. However, before any final conclusions can be drawn regarding the relative merits of different communication strategies, investigators must agree on the specific criteria that should be used to identify an effective intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10854457     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  58 in total

1.  Risky communication: pitfalls in counseling about risk, and how to avoid them.

Authors:  K O'Doherty; G K Suthers
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Information processing in the context of genetic risk: implications for genetic-risk communication.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Colin Perrier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Willingness to take travel-related health risks--a study among Finnish tourists in Asia during the avian influenza outbreak.

Authors:  A R Aro; A-M Vartti; M Schreck; P Turtiainen; A Uutela
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2009-01-06

4.  Social comparison framing in health news and its effect on perceptions of group risk.

Authors:  Cabral A Bigman
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2013-07-05

5.  Genetic test reporting enhances understanding of risk information and acceptance of prevention recommendations compared to family history-based counseling alone.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; Lisa G Aspinwall; Tammy K Stump; Wendy Kohlmann; Marjan Champine; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-07-16

6.  Disclosing the disclosure: factors associated with communicating the results of genetic susceptibility testing for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Sato Ashida; Laura M Koehly; J Scott Roberts; Clara A Chen; Susan Hiraki; Robert C Green
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009-12

7.  Perceived intrafamily melanoma risk communication.

Authors:  Lois J Loescher; Janice D Crist; Leilani A C L Siaki
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 8.  Decision making about cancer screening: an assessment of the state of the science and a suggested research agenda from the ASPO Behavioral Oncology and Cancer Communication Special Interest Group.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Jennifer L Hay; Aimee S James; Isaac M Lipkus; Helen I Meissner; Michael Stefanek; Jamie L Studts; John F P Bridges; David R Close; Deborah O Erwin; Resa M Jones; Karen Kaiser; Kathryn M Kash; Kimberly M Kelly; Simon J Craddock Lee; Jason Q Purnell; Laura A Siminoff; Susan T Vadaparampil; Catharine Wang
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Melanoma high-risk families' perceived health care provider risk communication.

Authors:  Lois J Loescher; Janice D Crist; Lee Cranmer; Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski; James A Warneke
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Improved health perception after genetic counselling for women at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer: construction of new questionnaires--an Italian exploratory study.

Authors:  Chiara Catania; Irene Feroce; Monica Barile; Aron Goldhirsch; Tommaso De Pas; Filippo de Braud; Sabrina Boselli; Laura Adamoli; Davide Radice; Alessandra Rossi; Gianluca Spitaleri; Cristina Noberasco; Bernardo Bonanni
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.