Literature DB >> 12236839

Perceived risk of breast cancer: influence of heuristic thinking.

Noreen C Facione1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of heuristic reasoning on women's perceived risk for developing breast cancer, and to test for an expected bias in the direction of optimism that is predicted by recent research on human cognition. DESCRIPTION OF STUDY: In total, 770 women recruited in community settings were surveyed regarding cancer screening behavior and their perceived risk of developing breast cancer.
RESULTS: Most women perceived their risk of breast cancer to be lower than that of other women (3:1), confirming the expected bias toward optimism, and this finding was not attributable to the personality trait of optimism. Women following mammography guidelines showed greater optimism that their risk was low. Cancer knowledge and education diminished unwarranted optimism. Women with a history of benign breast disease, with a female relative with breast cancer, or both overestimated their risk. All findings suggest that heuristic thinking is being used to estimate personal cancer risk. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians should expect women to be optimistic about their personal risk of developing breast cancer. As a result, women may put off breast cancer screening or delay the evaluation of breast symptoms that may signal breast cancer. Helping women to understand their relative risk is an essential part of a health promotion visit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12236839     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-5394.2002.105005.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Pract        ISSN: 1065-4704


  20 in total

1.  Perceived risk for breast cancer and its relationship to mammography in Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites.

Authors:  Heather Orom; Marc T Kiviniemi; Vickie L Shavers; Levi Ross; Willie Underwood
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-07-08

2.  Risky communication: pitfalls in counseling about risk, and how to avoid them.

Authors:  K O'Doherty; G K Suthers
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Dispositional optimism, goals, and engagement in health treatment programs.

Authors:  Andrew L Geers; Justin A Wellman; Laura D Seligman; Lisa A Wuyek; Lisa A Neff
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-11-29

4.  Breast cancer risk and provider recommendation for mammography among recently unscreened women in the United States.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Risa B Burns; Roger B Davis; Russell S Phillips; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Within-Gender Differences in Medical Decision Making Among Male Carriers of the BRCA Genetic Mutation for Hereditary Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sharlene Hesse-Biber; Chen An
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2015-10-14

6.  Preserving the self: the process of decision making about hereditary breast cancer and ovarian cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  A Fuchsia Howard; Lynda G Balneaves; Joan L Bottorff; Patricia Rodney
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-10-27

7.  Correlates of unrealistic risk beliefs in a nationally representative sample.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; William M P Klein; Richard P Moser; Mandi Yu; William R Waldron; Timothy S McNeel; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-11-26

8.  Gail model risk assessment and risk perceptions.

Authors:  John M Quillin; Elizabeth Fries; Donna McClish; Ellen Shaw de Paredes; Joann Bodurtha
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2004-04

9.  Exploring Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Breast and Cervical Cancers in Mongolia: A National Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Pooja Yerramilli; Otgonduya Dugee; Palam Enkhtuya; Felicia M Knaul; Alessandro R Demaio
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-09-28

10.  Perceptions of familial risk in those seeking a genetic risk assessment for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Susan Hiraki; Clara A Chen; J Scott Roberts; L Adrienne Cupples; Robert C Green
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.