Literature DB >> 17464516

The quantitative measurements of the intervertebral angulation and translation during cervical flexion and extension.

Shyi-Kuen Wu1, Li-Chieh Kuo, Haw-Chang H Lan, Sen-Wei Tsai, Chiung-Ling Chen, Fong-Chin Su.   

Abstract

The insufficient exploration of intervertebral translation during flexion and extension prevents the further understanding of the cervical biomechanics and treating the cervical related dysfunction. The objective of this study was to quantitatively measure the continuous intervertebral translation of healthy cervical spine during flexion and extension by videofluoroscopic technique. A total of 1,120 image sequences were analyzed for 56 healthy adult subjects by a precise image protocol during cervical flexion and extension. O: ur results showed there were no statistical angular differences among five spinal levels in either flexion or extension, except for the comparison between C2/3 (13.5 degrees) and C4/5 (22.6 degrees) angles. During cervical flexion, the smallest anterior translations were 0.7 mm at C2/3 level, followed by 0.9 mm at C6/7, 1.0 mm at C3/4, 1.1 mm at C5/6, and the largest 1.2 mm at C4/5 levels. The significantly greater translations were measured in the posterior direction at C3/4 (1.1 mm, P = 0.037), C4/5 (1.3 mm, P = 0.039), and C5/6 (1.2 mm, P = 0.005) levels than in the anterior one. The relatively fluctuant and small average posterior translation fashion at C6/7 level (0.4 mm) possibly originated from the variations in the direction of translation during cervical extension among subjects. Normalization with respect to the widths of individual vertebrae showed the total translation percentages relative to the adjacent vertebrae were 9.5, 13.7, 16.6, 15.0, and 8.6% for C2/3 to C6/7 levels, respectively, and appeared to be within the clinical-accepted ranges of translation in cervical spine. The intervertebral translations of cervical spine during flexion and extension movements were first described in quality and quantity based on the validated radiographic protocol. This analysis of the continuous intervertebral translations may be further employed to diagnose translation abnormalities like hypomobility or hypermobility and to monitor the treatment effect on cervical spines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17464516      PMCID: PMC2200749          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0372-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  41 in total

1.  Is the sagittal configuration of the cervical spine changed in women with chronic whiplash syndrome? A comparative computer-assisted radiographic assessment.

Authors:  E Kristjansson; H Jónsson
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Collegiate Football Players Display More Active Cervical Spine Mobility Than High School Football Players.

Authors:  John Nyland; Darren Johnson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Measurement of lumbar spinal flexion-extension kinematics from lateral radiographs: simulation of the effects of out-of-plane movement and errors in reference point placement.

Authors:  S B Harvey; D W Hukins
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Functional radiographic diagnosis of the cervical spine: flexion/extension.

Authors:  J Dvorak; D Froehlich; L Penning; H Baumgartner; M M Panjabi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc.

Authors:  Gwynedd E Pickett; Jeffrey P Rouleau; Neil Duggal
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Degeneration and height of cervical discs classified from MRI compared with precise height measurements from radiographs.

Authors:  Frode Kolstad; Gunnar Myhr; Kjell Arne Kvistad; Oystein P Nygaard; Gunnar Leivseth
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Determining the relationship between cervical lordosis and neck complaints.

Authors:  Jeb McAviney; Dan Schulz; Richard Bock; Deed E Harrison; Burt Holland
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Influence of age on cervicothoracic spinal curvature: an ex vivo radiographic survey.

Authors:  Jeffrey J W Boyle; Nicholas Milne; Kevin P Singer
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Intervertebral mobility in the progressive degenerative process. A radiostereometric analysis.

Authors:  Paul Axelsson; Bjarki S Karlsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Changes in segmental intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study.

Authors:  Charles A Reitman; John A Hipp; Lyndon Nguyen; Stephen I Esses
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  18 in total

1.  Effects of lumbar artificial disc design on intervertebral mobility: in vivo comparison between mobile-core and fixed-core.

Authors:  Joël Delécrin; Jérôme Allain; Jacques Beaurain; Jean-Paul Steib; Jean Huppert; Hervé Chataigner; Marc Ameil; Lucie Aubourg; Jean-Michel Nguyen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of the intervertebral disc spaces between axial and anterior lean cervical traction.

Authors:  Chin-Teng Chung; Sen-Wei Tsai; Chun-Jung Chen; Ting-Chung Wu; David Wang; Haw-Chang H Lan; Shyi-Kuen Wu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Estimating Facet Joint Apposition with Specimen-Specific Computer Models of Subaxial Cervical Spine Kinematics.

Authors:  Ryan D Quarrington; Darcy W Thompson-Bagshaw; Claire F Jones
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Intubation Biomechanics: Clinical Implications of Computational Modeling of Intervertebral Motion and Spinal Cord Strain during Tracheal Intubation in an Intact Cervical Spine.

Authors:  Benjamin C Gadomski; Bradley J Hindman; Mitchell I Page; Franklin Dexter; Christian M Puttlitz
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Continuous cervical spine kinematics during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Motion path of the instant center of rotation in the cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension: implications for artificial disc design and evaluation of motion quality after arthrodesis.

Authors:  William Anderst; Emma Baillargeon; William Donaldson; Joon Lee; James Kang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Intubation Biomechanics: Laryngoscope Force and Cervical Spine Motion during Intubation in Cadavers-Cadavers versus Patients, the Effect of Repeated Intubations, and the Effect of Type II Odontoid Fracture on C1-C2 Motion.

Authors:  Bradley J Hindman; Robert P From; Ricardo B Fontes; Vincent C Traynelis; Michael M Todd; M Bridget Zimmerman; Christian M Puttlitz; Brandon G Santoni
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Sensitivity, reliability and accuracy of the instant center of rotation calculation in the cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.

Authors:  Emma Baillargeon; William J Anderst
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Cervical motion segment percent contributions to flexion-extension during continuous functional movement in control subjects and arthrodesis patients.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Six-degrees-of-freedom cervical spine range of motion during dynamic flexion-extension after single-level anterior arthrodesis: comparison with asymptomatic control subjects.

Authors:  William J Anderst; Joon Y Lee; William F Donaldson; James D Kang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.