Literature DB >> 15150701

Intervertebral mobility in the progressive degenerative process. A radiostereometric analysis.

Paul Axelsson1, Bjarki S Karlsson.   

Abstract

Three separate stages have previously been defined in the progressive degenerative process. The first stage, characterized as temporary dysfunction with early degenerative findings, transforms into a second period of segmental instability evidenced by a resulting deformity. With the deformity the process has reached a late stage of definitive stabilization induced by osteoligamentary repair mechanisms. To test the validity of this three-stage hypothesis, we assessed the intervertebral mobility for the two most-distal lumbar disc levels in 18 adult patients with low back pain, disc degenerative findings and no prior spinal surgery. Each spinal segment was categorized according to grade of disc degeneration: (IA) normal disc height without dehydration; (IB) normal disc height with dehydration; (II) disc height decreased by less than 50%; (III) disc height decreased by at least 50%; and (IV) disc height obliterated. The intervertebral mobility was measured by radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and compared between the categories. With the patient changing position from supine to sitting, the mean vertical translation across the 11 discs categorized as IA was 2.0 mm. A small increase in mean vertical mobility with progressive loss of disc height through the degenerative stages IB (2.2 mm, seven discs) and II (2.6 mm, ten discs) was not significant. Further degeneration to grade III meant a significant mean reduction in vertical mobility to 0.8 mm for the eight discs in that category. No discs were classified as obliterated, category IV. The corresponding values for sagittal translations were 3.0 mm, 3.1 mm, 3.6 mm and 1.7 mm for the four disc categories found. These alterations were not statistically significant. We conclude that intervertebral mobility changes throughout the degenerative process, and a stage of stabilization begins when disc height is reduced by 50%. The segmental mobility status cannot be deduced from the radiographic, degenerative disc stage, since the inter-individual differences in mobility are pronounced for the same disc status. A fully stable situation cannot be taken for granted, even when the disc is reduced by more than 50%, considering the fact that some persisting mobility was seen for most patients in category III. A preceding stage of instability, in the clinical situation proven by a resulting deformity, was not verified in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15150701      PMCID: PMC3476609          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0713-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  15 in total

1.  Randomized radiostereometric study comparing osteogenic protein-1 (BMP-7) and autograft bone in human noninstrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion: 2002 Volvo Award in clinical studies.

Authors:  Ragnar Johnsson; Björn Strömqvist; Per Aspenberg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Is there increased intervertebral mobility in isthmic adult spondylolisthesis? A matched comparative study using roentgen stereophotogrammetry.

Authors:  P Axelsson; R Johnsson; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Lumbar instability: a dynamic approach by traction-compression radiography.

Authors:  O Friberg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The traction spur. An indicator of segmental instability.

Authors:  I Macnab
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Instability of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  W H Kirkaldy-Willis; H F Farfan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Stabilization of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine with external skeletal fixation.

Authors:  F P Magerl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Limited usefulness of traction-compression films in the radiographic diagnosis of lumbar spinal instability. Comparison with flexion-extension films.

Authors:  M Pitkänen; H I Manninen; K A Lindgrer; M Turunen; O Airaksinen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Temporary external pedicular fixation versus definitive bony fusion: a prospective comparative study on pain relief and function.

Authors:  Paul Axelsson; Ragnar Johnsson; Björn Strömqvist; Håkan Andréasson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-09-19       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Spontaneous effect of increased stability of the lower lumbar spine in cases of severe chronic back pain. The answer of an external transpeduncular fixation test.

Authors:  S Olerud; L Sjöström; G Karlström; M Hamberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Radiographic measurement of the lumbar spine. A clinical and experimental study in man.

Authors:  H Saraste; L A Broström; T Aparisi; G Axdorph
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  17 in total

1.  Effects of lumbar artificial disc design on intervertebral mobility: in vivo comparison between mobile-core and fixed-core.

Authors:  Joël Delécrin; Jérôme Allain; Jacques Beaurain; Jean-Paul Steib; Jean Huppert; Hervé Chataigner; Marc Ameil; Lucie Aubourg; Jean-Michel Nguyen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Controversies in failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  B Schaller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review. A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2004.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The quantitative measurements of the intervertebral angulation and translation during cervical flexion and extension.

Authors:  Shyi-Kuen Wu; Li-Chieh Kuo; Haw-Chang H Lan; Sen-Wei Tsai; Chiung-Ling Chen; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Vijay K Goel; Ahmad Faizan; Vivek Palepu; Sanghita Bhattacharya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Dynamic measurements of cervical neural foramina during neck movements in asymptomatic young volunteers.

Authors:  Victor Chang; Azam Basheer; Timothy Baumer; Daniel Oravec; Colin P McDonald; Michael J Bey; Stephen Bartol; Yener N Yeni
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after discectomy.

Authors:  Eun-Ho Shin; Kyu-Jung Cho; Young-Tae Kim; Myung-Hoon Park
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Grade three disc degeneration is a critical stage for anterior spondylolisthesis in lumbar spine.

Authors:  Tetsuhiro Iguchi; Kotaro Nishida; Takuma Ozaki; Atsushi Kitagawa; Nobuhiro Tsumura; Kenichiro Kakutani; Takashi Yurube; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Anterior spinal instrumentation combining a prosthetic disc nucleus with a flexible stabilization device: Manufacture and use in intervertebral disc repair.

Authors:  Da Bao; Dawei Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Generalized Joint Laxity is Associated with Primary Occurrence and Treatment Outcome of Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Woo Jin Han; Hong-Bae Kim; Gun Woo Lee; Jung Heum Choi; Won Jin Jo; Sun-Mi Lee
Journal:  Korean J Fam Med       Date:  2015-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.