Literature DB >> 3194782

Functional radiographic diagnosis of the cervical spine: flexion/extension.

J Dvorak1, D Froehlich, L Penning, H Baumgartner, M M Panjabi.   

Abstract

The cervical spines of 59 adults were examined by means of functional roentgenograms. They were divided into two groups consisting of 28 healthy adults and 31 patients who had sustained soft tissue injury to the cervical spine and who were complaining of neck pain. Roentgenographic lateral views were taken in active flexion and extension as well as in passive maximal flexion and extension. Measurements using the techniques of Penning and Buetti-Bauml were made by three observers independently. There was a highly significant difference between the active and passive segmental ranges of motion in healthy adults. Based on the normal values obtained in this study, 19 hypermobile segments could be diagnosed during the active examination, while 31 hypermobile segments were found during the passive examination. In addition, the active examination found 60 hypomobile segments, while the passive examination showed only 43 hypomobile segments. The Penning Method of measurement was found to be more reliable than that of Buetti-Bauml. If possible, the functional roentgenogram examination of the cervical spine in the sagittal plane should be performed by including passive movement and the range of motion should be compared with the normal values obtained by passive examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3194782     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198807000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  31 in total

1.  Segmental vertebral motion in the assessment of neck range of motion in whiplash patients.

Authors:  Filadelfio Puglisi; Renzo Ridi; Francesca Cecchi; Aurelio Bonelli; Robert Ferrari
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2004-06-12       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Functional radiographic diagnosis of the lumbar spine. Flexion-extension and lateral bending.

Authors:  J Dvorák; M M Panjabi; D G Chang; R Theiler; D Grob
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Comparing precision of distortion-compensated and stereophotogrammetric Roentgen analysis when monitoring fusion in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Gunnar Leivseth; Frode Kolstad; Oystein P Nygaard; Björn Zoega; W Frobin; P Brinckmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Risk of cervical injuries in mixed martial arts.

Authors:  T Kochhar; D L Back; B Mann; J Skinner
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Observer agreement in assessing flexion-extension X-rays of the cervical spine, with and without the use of quantitative measurements of intervertebral motion.

Authors:  Mehul Taylor; John A Hipp; Stanley D Gertzbein; Shankar Gopinath; Charles A Reitman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  The quantitative measurements of the intervertebral angulation and translation during cervical flexion and extension.

Authors:  Shyi-Kuen Wu; Li-Chieh Kuo; Haw-Chang H Lan; Sen-Wei Tsai; Chiung-Ling Chen; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Vijay K Goel; Ahmad Faizan; Vivek Palepu; Sanghita Bhattacharya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Continuous cervical spine kinematics during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Motion path of the instant center of rotation in the cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension: implications for artificial disc design and evaluation of motion quality after arthrodesis.

Authors:  William Anderst; Emma Baillargeon; William Donaldson; Joon Lee; James Kang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Three-dimensional biomechanical properties of the human cervical spine in vitro. I. Analysis of normal motion.

Authors:  N Wen; F Lavaste; J J Santin; J P Lassau
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.