Literature DB >> 23370681

Cervical motion segment percent contributions to flexion-extension during continuous functional movement in control subjects and arthrodesis patients.

William J Anderst1, William F Donaldson, Joon Y Lee, James D Kang.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Case control study.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify precisely and compare intervertebral segmental contributions to cervical spine flexion-extension during continuous, functional flexion-extension in asymptomatic subjects with patients who underwent single-level anterior arthrodesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Segmental contributions to cervical flexion-extension have traditionally been determined using single images collected at full flexion and full extension. These calculations neglect midrange motion and assume that percent contributions to motion remain constant throughout the entire flexion-extension range of motion (ROM).
METHODS: Six patients with single-level (C5-C6) anterior arthrodesis and 18 asymptomatic control subjects performed flexion-extension while biplane radiographs were collected at 30 images per second. A previously validated tracking process determined 3-dimensional vertebral position with submillimeter accuracy during continuous flexion-extension. Mixed-effects models of segmental percent contribution to C2-C7 flexion-extension were developed to identify differences in percent contribution within each motion segment, among motion segments, and between controls and patients who underwent arthrodesis over the full ROM.
RESULTS: The C2-C3, C3-C4, and C4-C5 motion segments made their maximum contributions during the midrange of motion. The C5-C6 and C6-C7 motion segments, in contrast, made their maximum contributions near the start and end of the ROM. Arthrodesis patients' contribution from the C4-C5 motion segment increased significantly over the range of motion from 30% to 95% of the total flexion-extension ROM (average increased contribution of 5.1%) and arthrodesis patients' contribution from the C6-C7 motion segment increased significantly over the entire flexion-extension ROM (average increased percentage contribution of 8.9%) in comparison to controls.
CONCLUSION: Cervical motion segment contributions to flexion-extension change significantly during the flexion-extension motion. The largest change in percent contribution to motion, relative to controls, occurs at the C6-C7 motion segment, over the entire ROM, suggesting a potential mechanical mechanism for the clinical observation of increased incidence of adjacent segment degeneration at C6-C7 rather than at C4-C5 after C5-C6 arthrodesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23370681      PMCID: PMC3686971          DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318289378d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  45 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Jan Goffin; Eric Geusens; Nicolaas Vantomme; Els Quintens; Yannic Waerzeggers; Bart Depreitere; Frank Van Calenbergh; Johan van Loon
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-04

2.  Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation.

Authors:  S D Boden; P R McCowin; D O Davis; T S Dina; A S Mark; S Wiesel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Functional radiographic diagnosis of the cervical spine: flexion/extension.

Authors:  J Dvorak; D Froehlich; L Penning; H Baumgartner; M M Panjabi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Radiographic changes following anterior cervical fusion.

Authors:  L Y Hunter; E M Braunstein; R W Bailey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1980 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Anterior cervical fusion for degenerated or protruded discs. A review of one hundred forty-six patients.

Authors:  D R Gore; S B Sepic
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Biomechanics of the aging spine.

Authors:  Stephen J Ferguson; Thomas Steffen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-09       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Normal range of motion of the cervical spine.

Authors:  B Lind; H Sihlbom; A Nordwall; H Malchau
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Accelerated spondylotic changes adjacent to the fused segment following central cervical corpectomy: magnetic resonance imaging study evidence.

Authors:  Vaijayantee Kulkarni; Vedantam Rajshekhar; Lakshminarayan Raghuram
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Kinematics of the cervical spine.

Authors:  S B Dunsker; D P Colley; F H Mayfield
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  1978

10.  Changes in segmental intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study.

Authors:  Charles A Reitman; John A Hipp; Lyndon Nguyen; Stephen I Esses
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  Inter-individual variation in vertebral kinematics affects predictions of neck musculoskeletal models.

Authors:  Derek D Nevins; Liying Zheng; Anita N Vasavada
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  In vivo cervical facet joint capsule deformation during flexion-extension.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Kinematic assessment of an elastic-core cervical disc prosthesis in one and two-level constructs.

Authors:  Richard D Guyer; Leonard I Voronov; Robert M Havey; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Gerard Carandang; Kenneth R Blank; Stephanie Werner; Josh Rubin; Nick Padovani; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2018-12-17

4.  MRI-detected spinal disc degenerative changes in athletes participating in the Rio de Janeiro 2016 Summer Olympics games.

Authors:  Mohamad Abdalkader; Ali Guermazi; Lars Engebretsen; Frank W Roemer; Mohamed Jarraya; Daichi Hayashi; Michel D Crema; Asim Z Mian
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.