Literature DB >> 16129250

Degeneration and height of cervical discs classified from MRI compared with precise height measurements from radiographs.

Frode Kolstad1, Gunnar Myhr, Kjell Arne Kvistad, Oystein P Nygaard, Gunnar Leivseth.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive study comparing MRI classifications with measurements from radiographs.
OBJECTIVES: 1. Define the relationship between MRI classified cervical disc degeneration and objectively measured disc height. 2. Assess the level of inter- and intra-observer errors using MRI in defining cervical disc degeneration. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical spine degeneration has been defined radiologically by loss of disc height, decreased disc and bone marrow signal intensity and disc protrusion/herniation on MRI. The intra- and inter-observer error using MRI in defining cervical degeneration influences data interpretation. Few previous studies have addressed this source of error. The relation and time sequence between cervical disc degeneration classified by MRI and cervical disc height decrease measured from radiographs is unclear.
METHODS: The MRI classification of degeneration was based on nucleus signal, prolaps identification and bone marrow signal. Two neuro-radiologists evaluated the MR-images independently in a blinded fashion. The radiographic disc height measurements were done by a new computer-assisted method compensating for image distortion and permitting comparison with normal level-, age- and gender-appropriate disc height. RESULTS/
CONCLUSIONS: 1. Progressing disc degeneration classified from MRI is on average significantly associated with a decrease of disc height as measured from radiographs. Within each MRI defined category of degeneration measured disc heights, however, scatter in a wide range. 2. The inter-observer agreement between two neuro-radiologists in both defining degeneration and disc height by MRI was only moderate. Studies addressing questions related to cervical disc degeneration should take this into consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16129250     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Imaging in rheumatology. Degenerative diseases of the spine].

Authors:  J Steinhagen; C R Habermann; J P Petersen; R Kothe; W Rüther
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  The quantitative measurements of the intervertebral angulation and translation during cervical flexion and extension.

Authors:  Shyi-Kuen Wu; Li-Chieh Kuo; Haw-Chang H Lan; Sen-Wei Tsai; Chiung-Ling Chen; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison of the intervertebral disc spaces between axial and anterior lean cervical traction.

Authors:  Chin-Teng Chung; Sen-Wei Tsai; Chun-Jung Chen; Ting-Chung Wu; David Wang; Haw-Chang H Lan; Shyi-Kuen Wu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Ranges of Cervical Intervertebral Disc Deformation During an In Vivo Dynamic Flexion-Extension of the Neck.

Authors:  Yan Yu; Haiqing Mao; Jing-Sheng Li; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Liming Cheng; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li; Thomas D Cha
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Qualitative and quantitative assessment of degeneration of cervical intervertebral discs and facet joints.

Authors:  Joris Walraevens; Baoge Liu; Joke Meersschaert; Philippe Demaerel; Hans Delye; Bart Depreitere; Jos Vander Sloten; Jan Goffin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Histological analysis of surgical lumbar intervertebral disc tissue provides evidence for an association between disc degeneration and increased body mass index.

Authors:  Christoph Weiler; Mercedes Lopez-Ramos; H Michael Mayer; Andreas Korge; Christoph J Siepe; Karin Wuertz; Veronique Weiler; Norbert Boos; Andreas G Nerlich
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-11-16

Review 7.  The incidence of adjacent segment degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA): a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Baohui Yang; Haopeng Li; Ting Zhang; Xijing He; Siyue Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Correlation of Foraminal Area and Response to Cervical Nerve Root Injections.

Authors:  Wilson Z Ray; Syed Akbari; Lubdha M Shah; Erica Bisson
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-07-20

9.  Imbalanced protein expression patterns of anabolic, catabolic, anti-catabolic and inflammatory cytokines in degenerative cervical disc cells: new indications for gene therapeutic treatments of cervical disc diseases.

Authors:  Demissew S Mern; Anja Beierfuβ; Johann Fontana; Claudius Thomé; Aldemar A Hegewald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reliable Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Grading System for Cervical Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Authors:  Lloydine J Jacobs; Antonia F Chen; James D Kang; Joon Y Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.