Literature DB >> 15167672

Changes in segmental intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study.

Charles A Reitman1, John A Hipp, Lyndon Nguyen, Stephen I Esses.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, observational.
OBJECTIVES: Quantify the changes in intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis over time. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: One of the frequently acknowledged sequelae following anterior cervical fusion is the development of adjacent segment disease. It has been argued that a spine fusion transfers stress to adjacent levels and results in increased compensatory motion. However, there are conflicting reports as to whether this actually occurs, and most of these are in vitro or retrospective clinical studies.
METHODS: Patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion underwent a preoperative dynamic fluoroscopic study, followed by imaging at regular intervals after surgery. Imaging data were analyzed by a validated software system. Relative motion between adjacent vertebrae was then calculated, and changes in motion cephalad to the fusion followed over time.
RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 13 months (10-22 months). Intervertebral motion adjacent to the fusion changed by more than 4 degrees in 4 of the 21 patients. However, on average, there was no difference between preoperative and postoperative motion for shear, flexion-extension, or vertical displacement at the anterior or posterior disc space.
CONCLUSIONS: Although there was some individual variation, at a mean of 13 months following surgery, there was no significant change in the average junctional intervertebral motion. If fusion is going to affect adjacent motion, it appears that this does not consistently occur in the first 1 to 2 years following surgery. Additionally, there was no observable relationship between motion and development of degenerative changes during this time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15167672     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200406010-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  34 in total

Review 1.  Prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Xinwei Wang; Wanshan Bai; Xiaolong Shen; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the cervical spine after anterior cervical decompression and fusion at an adjacent level: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Sadayoshi Watanabe; Nozomu Inoue; Tomonori Yamaguchi; Yoshitaka Hirano; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Shintaro Nishida; Yuichi Hirose; Junichi Mizuno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The effect of multilevel anterior cervical fusion on neck motion.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Wu; Xin-Wei Wang; Wen Yuan; Yang Liu; Nicholas Tsai; Yu-Cheng Peng; Yu Chen; Cong Wang; Shi-Yi Gu; Hua-Jiang Chen; Xu-Hui Zhou; Hai-Long He; Yuan-Yuan Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Disc replacement using Pro-Disc C versus fusion: a prospective randomised and controlled radiographic and clinical study.

Authors:  A Nabhan; F Ahlhelm; T Pitzen; W I Steudel; J Jung; K Shariat; O Steimer; F Bachelier; D Pape
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Observer agreement in assessing flexion-extension X-rays of the cervical spine, with and without the use of quantitative measurements of intervertebral motion.

Authors:  Mehul Taylor; John A Hipp; Stanley D Gertzbein; Shankar Gopinath; Charles A Reitman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  The quantitative measurements of the intervertebral angulation and translation during cervical flexion and extension.

Authors:  Shyi-Kuen Wu; Li-Chieh Kuo; Haw-Chang H Lan; Sen-Wei Tsai; Chiung-Ling Chen; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Fusion versus Bryan Cervical Disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  Lei Cheng; Lin Nie; Li Zhang; Yong Hou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Assessment of adjacent-segment mobility after cervical disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with 1 year's results.

Authors:  A Nabhan; B Ishak; W I Steudel; S Ramadhan; O Steimer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Differential segmental motion contribution of single- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Andy Chien; Dar-Ming Lai; Shwu-Fen Wang; Chih-Hsiu Cheng; Wei-Li Hsu; Jaw-Lin Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Continuous cervical spine kinematics during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.