Literature DB >> 34791608

Estimating Facet Joint Apposition with Specimen-Specific Computer Models of Subaxial Cervical Spine Kinematics.

Ryan D Quarrington1, Darcy W Thompson-Bagshaw2,3, Claire F Jones2,3.   

Abstract

Computational models of experimental data can provide a noninvasive method to estimate spinal facet joint biomechanics. Existing models typically consider each vertebra as one rigid-body and assume uniform facet cartilage thickness. However, facet deflection occurs during motion, and cervical facet cartilage is nonuniform. Multi rigid-body computational models were used to investigate the effect of specimen-specific cartilage profiles on facet contact area estimates. Twelve C6/C7 segments underwent non-destructive intervertebral motions. Kinematics and facet deflections were measured. Three-dimensional models of the vertebra and cartilage thickness estimates were obtained from pre-test CT data. Motion-capture data was applied to two model types (2RB: C6, C7 vertebrae each one rigid body; 3RB: left and right C6 posterior elements, and C7 vertebrae, each one rigid body) and maximum facet mesh penetration was compared. Constant thickness cartilage (CTC) and spatially-varying thickness cartilage (SVTC) profiles were applied to the facet surfaces of the 3RB model. Cartilage apposition area (CAA) was compared. Linear mixed-effects models were used for all quantitative comparisons. The 3RB model significantly reduced penetrating mesh elements by accounting for facet deflections (p = 0.001). The CTC profile resulted in incongruent facet articulation, whereas realistic congruence was observed for the SVTC profile. The SVTC profile demonstrated significantly larger CAA than the CTC model (p < 0.001).
© 2021. Biomedical Engineering Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apposition; Cartilage; Neck

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34791608     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-021-02888-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  28 in total

1.  Development of a model based method for investigating facet articulation.

Authors:  Daniel J Cook; Boyle C Cheng
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Influence of varying compressive loading methods on physiologic motion patterns in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Kevin M Bell; Yiguo Yan; Richard E Debski; Gwendolyn A Sowa; James D Kang; Scott Tashman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  An improved biomechanical testing protocol for evaluating spinal arthroplasty and motion preservation devices in a multilevel human cadaveric cervical model.

Authors:  Denis J DiAngelo; Kevin T Foley
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.047

4.  Measuring contact area, force, and pressure for bioengineering applications: using Fuji Film and TekScan systems.

Authors:  Kent N Bachus; Alyssa L DeMarco; Kyle T Judd; Daniel S Horwitz; Darrel S Brodke
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Importance of the cervical capsular joint cartilage geometry on head and facet joint kinematics assessed in a Finite element neck model.

Authors:  M A Corrales; D S Cronin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables.

Authors:  J W Bartlett; C Frost
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  An analysis of the unconfined compression of articular cartilage.

Authors:  C G Armstrong; W M Lai; V C Mow
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Contact pressure in the facet joint during sagittal bending of the cadaveric cervical spine.

Authors:  Nicolas V Jaumard; Joel A Bauman; Christine L Weisshaar; Benjamin B Guarino; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Clinical outcomes of 90 isolated unilateral facet fractures, subluxations, and dislocations treated surgically and nonoperatively.

Authors:  Marcel F Dvorak; Charles G Fisher; Bizhan Aarabi; Mitchel B Harris; R John Hurbert; Y Raja Rampersaud; Alex Vaccaro; James S Harrop; Russ P Nockels; Ignacio N Madrazo; David Schwartz; Brian K Kwon; Yinshan Zhao; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Based Specimen-Specific Kinematic Model for Ex Vivo Assessment of Lumbar Neuroforaminal Space.

Authors:  Robert M Havey; Jeremy Goodsitt; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Muturi Muriuki; Tejaswy Potluri; Leonard I Voronov; Laurie M Lomasney; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.241

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Effect of Axial Compression and Distraction on Cervical Facet Cartilage Apposition During Shear and Bending Motions.

Authors:  Ryan D Quarrington; Darcy W Thompson-Bagshaw; Claire F Jones
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.934

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.