Literature DB >> 17462672

Bias in the gradient-sensing response of chemotactic cells.

Ron Skupsky1, Colin McCann, Ralph Nossal, Wolfgang Losert.   

Abstract

We apply linear stability theory and perform perturbation studies to better characterize, and to generate new experimental predictions from, a model of chemotactic gradient sensing in eukaryotic cells. The model uses reaction-diffusion equations to describe 3(') phosphoinositide signaling and its regulation at the plasma membrane. It demonstrates a range of possible gradient-sensing mechanisms and captures such characteristic behaviors as strong polarization in response to static gradients, adaptation to differing mean levels of stimulus, and plasticity in response to changing gradients. An analysis of the stability of polarized steady-state solutions indicates that the model is most sensitive to off-axis perturbations. This biased sensitivity is also reflected in responses to localized external stimuli, and leads to a clear experimental prediction, namely, that a cell which is polarized in a background gradient will be most sensitive to transient point-source stimuli lying within a range of angles that are oblique with respect to the polarization axis. Stimuli at angles below this range will elicit responses whose directions overshoot the stimulus angle, while responses to stimuli applied at larger angles will undershoot the stimulus angle. We argue that such a bias is likely to be a general feature of gradient sensing in highly motile cells, particularly if they are optimized to respond to small gradients. Finally, an angular bias in gradient sensing might lead to preferred turn angles and zigzag movements of cells moving up chemotactic gradients, as has been noted under certain experimental conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17462672      PMCID: PMC2763186          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  55 in total

1.  In vivo chemotactic properties and spatial expression of PDGF in developing mesenteric microvascular networks.

Authors:  P J Zeller; T C Skalak; A M Ponce; R J Price
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Receptor-mediated activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins in living cells.

Authors:  C Janetopoulos; T Jin; P Devreotes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Localization of the G protein betagamma complex in living cells during chemotaxis.

Authors:  T Jin; N Zhang; Y Long; C A Parent; P N Devreotes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-02-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Turing instabilities in general systems.

Authors:  R A Satnoianu; M Menzinger; P K Maini
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 5.  Dictyostelium: a model for regulated cell movement during morphogenesis.

Authors:  R A Firtel; R Meili
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 6.  Pattern formation by local self-activation and lateral inhibition.

Authors:  H Meinhardt; A Gierer
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.345

7.  A diffusion-translocation model for gradient sensing by chemotactic cells.

Authors:  M Postma; P J Van Haastert
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Cellular asymmetry and individuality in directional sensing.

Authors:  Azadeh Samadani; Jerome Mettetal; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A mathematical model for chemoattractant gradient sensing based on receptor-regulated membrane phospholipid signaling dynamics.

Authors:  A Narang; K K Subramanian; D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  Cytohesins and centaurins: mediators of PI 3-kinase-regulated Arf signaling.

Authors:  T R Jackson; B G Kearns; A B Theibert
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 13.807

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bayesian model predicts the response of axons to molecular gradients.

Authors:  Duncan Mortimer; Julia Feldner; Timothy Vaughan; Irina Vetter; Zac Pujic; William J Rosoff; Kevin Burrage; Peter Dayan; Linda J Richards; Geoffrey J Goodhill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Accuracy of direct gradient sensing by single cells.

Authors:  Robert G Endres; Ned S Wingreen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Large-scale microfluidic gradient arrays reveal axon guidance behaviors in hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  Nirveek Bhattacharjee; Albert Folch
Journal:  Microsyst Nanoeng       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 7.127

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.