Literature DB >> 11556724

A mathematical model for chemoattractant gradient sensing based on receptor-regulated membrane phospholipid signaling dynamics.

A Narang1, K K Subramanian, D A Lauffenburger.   

Abstract

The crawling movement of cells in response to a chemoattractant gradient is a complex process requiring the coordination of various subcellular activities. Although a complete description of the mechanisms underlying cell movement remains elusive, the very first step of directional sensing, enabling the cell to perceive the imposed gradient, is becoming more transparent. A fundamental problem of directional sensing is its exquisite sensitivity. Even in the presence of relatively shallow chemoattractant gradients, cell projections are extended precisely in the region exposed to the highest chemoattractant concentration. This reflects the existence of a mechanism for amplifying the external signal. Recent experiments have identified a potential candidate for the seat of this amplification-membrane phosphoinositides such as PI4,5P2 and PI3,4,5P3 appear to be the first components of the signal transduction pathway to be amplified. Perturbing the cell with various chemoattractant gradients reveals a rich spectrum of phosphoinositide dynamics (Parent, C. A., and P. N. Devreotes. Science 284:765, 1999). The goal of this work is to develop a mathematical model of these phosphoinositide dynamics. Specifically, we address the following questions: (a) Which signaling pathway could lead to the localized accumulation of membrane phosphoinositides? (b) Why is this accumulation independent of the slope and mean value of the chemoattractant gradient? The model is based on the phosphoinositide cycle that transfers phosphoinositides between the plasma membrane and endoplasmic reticulum. We show that a mathematical model taking due account of receptor desensitization and the reaction-diffusion processes of the phosphoinositide cycle captures many of the experimentally observed dynamics. Having shown the plausibility of the model with respect to directional sensing, we discuss its implications for lamellipod extension, the process that follows directional sensing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11556724     DOI: 10.1114/1.1385805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  34 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of cell polarity during eukaryotic chemotaxis: the chemotactic compass.

Authors:  Orion D Weiner
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.382

2.  Spatial analysis of 3' phosphoinositide signaling in living fibroblasts: II. Parameter estimates for individual cells from experiments.

Authors:  Ian C Schneider; Jason M Haugh
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Spatial analysis of 3' phosphoinositide signaling in living fibroblasts: I. Uniform stimulation model and bounds on dimensionless groups.

Authors:  Jason M Haugh; Ian C Schneider
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Chemoattractant-induced phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate accumulation is spatially amplified and adapts, independent of the actin cytoskeleton.

Authors:  Chris Janetopoulos; Lan Ma; Peter N Devreotes; Pablo A Iglesias
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Two complementary, local excitation, global inhibition mechanisms acting in parallel can explain the chemoattractant-induced regulation of PI(3,4,5)P3 response in dictyostelium cells.

Authors:  Lan Ma; Chris Janetopoulos; Liu Yang; Peter N Devreotes; Pablo A Iglesias
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Reaction-diffusion systems in intracellular molecular transport and control.

Authors:  Siowling Soh; Marta Byrska; Kristiana Kandere-Grzybowska; Bartosz A Grzybowski
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Eukaryotic chemotaxis.

Authors:  Wouter-Jan Rappel; William F Loomis
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

8.  Distinguishing modes of eukaryotic gradient sensing.

Authors:  R Skupsky; W Losert; R J Nossal
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis: a balanced inactivation model.

Authors:  Herbert Levine; David A Kessler; Wouter-Jan Rappel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Cellular asymmetry and individuality in directional sensing.

Authors:  Azadeh Samadani; Jerome Mettetal; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.