Literature DB >> 16864788

Cellular asymmetry and individuality in directional sensing.

Azadeh Samadani1, Jerome Mettetal, Alexander van Oudenaarden.   

Abstract

It is generally assumed that single cells in an isogenic population, when exposed to identical environments, exhibit the same behavior. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that, even in a genetically identical population, cellular behavior can vary significantly among cells. Here we explore this variability in the gradient-sensing response of Dictyostelium cells when exposed to repeated spatiotemporal pulses of chemoattractant. Our experiments show the response of a single cell to be highly reproducible from pulse to pulse. In contrast, a large variability in the response direction and magnitude is observed from cell to cell, even when different cells are exposed to the same pulse. First, these results indicate that the gradient-sensing network has inherent asymmetries that can significantly impact the ability of cells to faithfully sense the direction of extracellular signals (cellular asymmetry). Second, we find that the magnitude of this asymmetry varies greatly among cells. Some cells are able to accurately follow the direction of an extracellular stimulus, whereas, in other cells, the intracellular asymmetry dominates, resulting in a polarization axis that is independent of the direction of the extracellular cue (cellular individuality). We integrate these experimental findings into a model that treats the effective signal a cell detects as the product of the extracellular signal and the asymmetric intracellular signal. With this model we successfully predict the population response. This cellular individuality and asymmetry might fundamentally limit the fidelity of signal detection; in contrast, however, it might be beneficial by diversifying phenotypes in isogenic populations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16864788      PMCID: PMC1544207          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0601909103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  33 in total

1.  A discrete cell model with adaptive signalling for aggregation of Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  J C Dallon; H G Othmer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Two complementary, local excitation, global inhibition mechanisms acting in parallel can explain the chemoattractant-induced regulation of PI(3,4,5)P3 response in dictyostelium cells.

Authors:  Lan Ma; Chris Janetopoulos; Liu Yang; Peter N Devreotes; Pablo A Iglesias
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  G protein signaling events are activated at the leading edge of chemotactic cells.

Authors:  C A Parent; B J Blacklock; W M Froehlich; D B Murphy; P N Devreotes
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-10-02       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Origins of individual swimming behavior in bacteria.

Authors:  M D Levin; C J Morton-Firth; W N Abouhamad; R B Bourret; D Bray
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Chemoattractant-mediated transient activation and membrane localization of Akt/PKB is required for efficient chemotaxis to cAMP in Dictyostelium.

Authors:  R Meili; C Ellsworth; S Lee; T B Reddy; H Ma; R A Firtel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Quantitative imaging of single live cells reveals spatiotemporal dynamics of multistep signaling events of chemoattractant gradient sensing in Dictyostelium.

Authors:  Xuehua Xu; Martin Meier-Schellersheim; Xuanmao Jiao; Lauren E Nelson; Tian Jin
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Dynamic distribution of chemoattractant receptors in living cells during chemotaxis and persistent stimulation.

Authors:  Z Xiao; N Zhang; D B Murphy; P N Devreotes
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1997-10-20       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  A stochastic model for leukocyte random motility and chemotaxis based on receptor binding fluctuations.

Authors:  R T Tranquillo; D A Lauffenburger; S H Zigmond
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Orientation of chemotactic cells and growth cones: models and mechanisms.

Authors:  H Meinhardt
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  CRAC, a cytosolic protein containing a pleckstrin homology domain, is required for receptor and G protein-mediated activation of adenylyl cyclase in Dictyostelium.

Authors:  R Insall; A Kuspa; P J Lilly; G Shaulsky; L R Levin; W F Loomis; P Devreotes
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  38 in total

1.  Diverse sensitivity thresholds in dynamic signaling responses by social amoebae.

Authors:  C Joanne Wang; Adriel Bergmann; Benjamin Lin; Kyuri Kim; Andre Levchenko
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 8.192

2.  Eukaryotic chemotaxis.

Authors:  Wouter-Jan Rappel; William F Loomis
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

3.  Bias in the gradient-sensing response of chemotactic cells.

Authors:  Ron Skupsky; Colin McCann; Ralph Nossal; Wolfgang Losert
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Adaptive-control model for neutrophil orientation in the direction of chemical gradients.

Authors:  Daniel Irimia; Gábor Balázsi; Nitin Agrawal; Mehmet Toner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Characterizing heterogeneous cellular responses to perturbations.

Authors:  Michael D Slack; Elisabeth D Martinez; Lani F Wu; Steven J Altschuler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  3'-phosphoinositides regulate the coordination of speed and accuracy during chemotaxis.

Authors:  J S Gruver; J P Wikswo; C Y Chung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Rho GTPases orient directional sensing in chemotaxis.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Hiroshi Senoo; Hiromi Sesaki; Miho Iijima
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  High fidelity information processing in folic acid chemotaxis of Dictyostelium amoebae.

Authors:  Igor Segota; Surin Mong; Eitan Neidich; Archana Rachakonda; Catherine J Lussenhop; Carl Franck
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Mechanistic insights from a quantitative analysis of pollen tube guidance.

Authors:  Shannon F Stewman; Matthew Jones-Rhoades; Prabhakar Bhimalapuram; Martin Tchernookov; Daphne Preuss; Aaron R Dinner
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  Temporal switching and cell-to-cell variability in Ca2+ release activity in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Naotoshi Nakamura; Toshiko Yamazawa; Yohei Okubo; Masamitsu Iino
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 11.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.